Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay rights advances likely in Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Geezus Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:44 PM
Original message
Gay rights advances likely in Congress
NEW YORK - Anti-gay bias has flared up in Hollywood and pro basketball recently, and soon the topic will be thrust dramatically into a new forum — a reshaped Congress likely to pass the first major federal gay-rights bills.

Wary conservative leaders, as well as gay-rights advocates, share a belief that at least two measures will win approval this year: a hate-crimes bill that would cover offenses motivated by anti-gay bias, and a measure that would outlaw workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Also on the table — although with more doubtful prospects — will be a measure to be introduced Wednesday seeking repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that bans openly gay and lesbian Americans from serving in the military.


(SNIP)


"With liberals in control, there's a good possibility they'll both pass," said Matt Barber, a policy director with the conservative group Concerned Women for America. "They're both dangerous to freedom of conscience, to religious liberties, to free speech."



By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer


Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070224/ap_on_re_us/gay_rights



How about that Matt Barber. Apparently telling peolpe they can't assault gays and lesbians is a violstion to the first amendment. What an asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's about damn fucking time. And what will Bushbot do? Veto or let it slide on through?
Please and pander to the fundies or give "favor" to Little Miss Mary Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to DU Geezus
Thanks for posting, this has been a long time coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geezus Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for the welcome and your welcome for the post. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. FINALLY.
Jesus Mary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll believe it when I see it, but thanks for giving me some hope nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Matt Barber is a woman?
The CWA is a fascist organization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I believe Lynn Cheney is/was a founding member of CWA n/.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oops. Mistake. Confusing CWA with IWF...
IWF= Independent Women's Forum, another RW anti-woman nazi group. Lynn V. Cheney is a former member of their board of directors. http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=11625
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. No, it's probably just that they're *real* women you see, and
need a man to decide on policy for them, and speak for them.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Normal, decent people have no problem with laws that punish terrorist-like acts...
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 05:38 PM by Zenlitened
... nor with laws that ensure that people have the right to be judged on their job performance.

Then there's the Concerned "Women" of America...

These are not normal, decent people.

They are depraved and stunted little monomaniacs whose only "joy" in life seems to come from trying to prevent America from achieving her ideals of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Those things, they insist, are only for Christian bigots.

Sick, horrible people. :puke:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. "They're both dangerous to freedom of conscience, to religious liberties, to free speech."
:wtf:

:shrug:

Since when were harmful actions against another person based on bigotry protected speech or liberty? Did I miss a meeting?

And Asshole, I don't know who's conscience you are speaking of, but being able to beat someone or fire someone because of who they love is fucked in the head, and would trouble the conscience of any human being that was not ruled by hate or ignorance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. I just have to point out the irony (or not) of a man being the
policy director for Concerned Women of America.

Too perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC