Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interview: Ex-NATO Commander cautions Iran (W. Clark)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:46 AM
Original message
Interview: Ex-NATO Commander cautions Iran (W. Clark)
~snip~

JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia, Feb. 26 (UPI) -- A gradual withdrawal from Iraq, a diplomatic offensive in the Middle East and dialogue with Iran over its nuclear program could help introduce needed change of policy according to NATO's former Supreme Allied Commander Europe Gen. Wesley Clark.

~snip~


Asked if the U.S. reinforcements in the Gulf signal preparations for a possible strike against Iran, he said: "Certainly, it's an indication, a potential... If I were the Iranians, I would take very seriously the U.S. capabilities present in the region."

Tehran, he said, needs not to expect "that the world is going to acquiesce an Iranian nuclear weapon. It's up to Iran to solve this diplomatically and the U.S. and Iran should have a dialogue."

~snip~


The question remains: Would President George W. Bush strike Iran despite the failure in Iraq? And would attacking Iran serve its purpose?

Such a strike "depends on a number of factors", according to Clark. "I think there is a military option but it's not an attractive option. The right solution is a diplomatic solution. Iran needs to understand that it's much safer and it would be able to pursue its aims much more effectively if it doesn't have a nuclear weapon."

more:http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20070226-080801-1303r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for intelligence and sanity.
Go for a diplomatic solution. Why not? K&R! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flarney Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. A diplomatic solution???
Yer talkin gibberish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then sign up, Flarney
They need cannon fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flarney Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sorry, I forgot the ::sarcasm:: icon
I was just kidding. I'm all for the proposed Department of Peace. Beyond that, I think we should decide as a country that no one should be allowed to profit from war and make private military contractors a thing of the past.

Imagine having a Secretary of State that actually pursued diplomacy, as opposed to this:

"When Israeli officials asked Secretary Rice about the possibility of exploring the seriousness of Syria in its calls for peace talks, her response was unequivocal: Don't even think about it." ( from: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/829441.html via MotherJones)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, Flarney...
I reacted off the cuff. When I reread your post I thought I detected a hint of :sarcasm: but I couldn't tell for sure.:hug: Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Same advice he kept giving on Korea too. There, * heeded, but only because...
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 11:51 AM by The Count
duh, no oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC