Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gene Lyons: Nothing to hide, nothing to fear in Bushworld

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:16 AM
Original message
Gene Lyons: Nothing to hide, nothing to fear in Bushworld
http://www.nwanews.com/adg/Editorial/184484/

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear in Bushworld
Gene Lyons

Here’s an artifact of archaic, pre-9 /11 thinking I stumbled across on the Internet: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Readers who remained alert through high school may recognize the Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Awfully stuffy, don’t you think ? Who says “shall” anymore ? “Particularly describing,” indeed. No red-blooded patriot would use the phrase. It reads like something written by sissies in powdered wigs. Besides, who’s to say what’s unreasonable if not our glorious leader, George W. Bush ? In Bushworld, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. In Bushworld, we don’t need no stinkin’ warrants. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales emphatically assured Congress in November 2005 that a Washington Post article suggesting widespread misuse of so-called national security letters, or NSLs, by the FBI was substantially false. A veritable parade of administration witnesses assured congressmen contemplating the re-enactment of the Patriot Act that stringent Justice Department supervision prevented it.

NSLs are a potential police-state tool, essentially granting investigators sweeping powers previously enjoyed by such innovators in security as the Soviet KGB. Issued entirely without judicial oversight—no prosecutors, judges or grand juries—they allow the feds a secret peek at intimate aspects of our lives.

“The records it yields,” wrote the Post’s Barton Gellman, “describe where a person makes and spends money, with whom he lives and lived before, how much he gambles, what he buys on-line, what he pawns and borrows, where he travels, how he invests, what he searches for and reads on the Web, and who telephones or e-mails him at home and at work.”

NSL recipients, like banks and telephone companies, are forbidden to notify customers that their records have been copied into FBI databases. Combined with widespread wiretapping conducted by the National Security Administration, they render privacy rights all but nonexistent.

And here’s the beauty part: It’s all top secret. Nobody can contest these abuses in court because nobody can prove they have legal “standing.” It’s not just George Orwell’s “1984” that needs frequent rereading, but Joseph Heller’s “Catch-22.”

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was wondering what happened to Gene Lyons.
Moose and squirrel has been gone for weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC