Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WALSH: Do we have to claim the Utahns in D.C.?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:37 AM
Original message
WALSH: Do we have to claim the Utahns in D.C.?
We enthusiastically made Bush's Brain our own as he swept into the White House. Rove, the Republican mastermind and Olympus High School graduate, was something to be proud of. Besides, his proximity to the Oval Office might be useful to loyal red-state voters.
But Rove isn't anything to boast about these days. And neither are the rest of our native sons who went to Washington seeking glory, only to belly flop in scandal soup.

Kyle Sampson is just the latest to trip and conk his noggin on the pedestal.

~snip~

Jay Bybee, a star of BYU's law school/training camp for right-leaning attorneys and good GOP soldiers, penned the Bush administration's "torture memo." In 2002, then-assistant U.S. Attorney General Bybee provided the legal reasoning for soldiers at Abu Ghraib to torment Iraqi prisoners. A year later, Bybee was whisked onto the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals - a lifetime appointment - with bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate and a letter of recommendation from then-George Washington University Law School Dean Michael Young, now University of Utah president.


Current Utah U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman and former U.S. Attorney Brent Ward had bit parts in the scandal. While working for the Senate Judiciary Committee, Tolman added language to the Patriot Act that allowed the attorney general to replace U.S. attorneys without Senate approval - a change senators yanked last week. And Ward, the nation's porn czar, whined to Justice Department officials that now-fired U.S. attorneys in Arizona and Nevada would not prosecute smut cases.

and there is more here: http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5517137?source=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC