Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How I know Blair faked Iran map

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 08:25 PM
Original message
How I know Blair faked Iran map
How I know Blair faked Iran map
By CRAIG MURRAY, Former Ambassador to Uzbekistan and Head of the Foreign Office's Maritime Section
Last updated at 11:44am on 1st April 2007


Like most senior Royal Navy officers, Commodore Nick Lambert has great reserves of professional expertise and common sense. The Coalition task force commander was aboard HMS Cornwall when 15 Royal Navy personnel serving on the frigate were seized at gunpoint by Iranian forces on March 23.

<snip>

But what about the map the Ministry of Defence produced on Tuesday, with territorial boundaries set out by a clear red line, and the co-ordinates of the incident marked in relation to it?

I have news for you. Those boundaries are fake. They were drawn up by the MoD. They are not agreed or recognised by any international authority.

To put it at its most charitable, they are a potential boundary. It is accepted practice, where no boundary exists, to work by a rule-of-thumb idea of where a boundary, based on a median line between the two coasts, might be.

But to elevate that to a hard and fast boundary, and then base a major international incident on being a few hundred yards one side or the other, is out of order.

<snip>

But the No10 spin doctors stepped in, seeing a propaganda opportunity to portray Blair as fighting evil Iranians.

<more>

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=445896&in_page_id=1787

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, okay, he's the Uzbekistan guy.
The guy they gave the Matthew Dowd treatment to (poor guy, it's a tragedy, he's simply gone mad you see, mad). Seriously though, sounds like the guy knows what he's talking about... and Blair has not been nearly as shrill in the last few days. Probably got told there was no way they'd get their people back if he didn't shut up and let the professionals do their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The US tried to "get" some high-ranking Iranians
and still have five from the diplomatic corps.....no one seems to know where they are.

That's very illegal, by the way. So where do the US and GB get off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It seems like the US neocons and GB neo-what? will only get off when
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 10:11 PM by Amonester
the Iranians will be submitted to "accept" keeping 1 barrel of crude out of 5 until the day they'll have none left. That's what this criminal cabal is all about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. US neo-con = UK New Labour both deluded, greedy, robbing liars
may they burn in hell for eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Updates at his site K&R, link below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. the ship would be on Iraq land at low tide
assuming the map I saw was correct, and,
assuming the UK's fix was correct.

the ship would be on land, southwest
of the shippimg channel, at extreme low tide..

the extended boundries, although in dispute,
make no difference here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC