Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After Half a Year on the Hill: What I Know For Sure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:56 AM
Original message
After Half a Year on the Hill: What I Know For Sure
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/21384

After Half a Year on the Hill: What I Know For Sure
Submitted by stacybannerman on Tue, 2007-04-17 15:27. Congress

By Stacy Bannerman


snip//

When the people that got elected on a strong anti-war platform voted to continue the war, they broke a sacred trust with their constituents. Keith Ellison (D-MN), Jim McGovern (D-MA) et. al., clean out your desks and return the keys to your offices. Immediately.

When Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA), a long-time, outspoken opponent of the war, cannot look me in the face as he passes by on his way to vote for the war, I know that he knows that what he’s doing is wrong.

The rationalizations for continuing to fund the war under the patently false guise of “supporting the troops” are just a different page from the same book that was used to build the case for war.

The verbal gymnastics involved in explaining an increasingly deadly and futile occupation are yet another indication that the policy is fundamentally flawed. A moral good requires no justification.

Repeatedly telling me that you never got my written requests for a meeting before relenting and whipping out your hard copy of my letter greatly annoys me and makes you a liar.

A bully in a blue suit is a bully in a blue suit, regardless of the color of the tie.

The majority of politicians, like far too many Americans, are primarily - often exclusively - concerned about their own immediate self-interests. They will act accordingly, even when it causes harm to others or violates their professed values.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd Like to Know How the Voter Lost His Credibility
Especially the Left of Insane voter. Is it that the voter is irrelevant? Is that what they are trying to tell us by not telling us anything?

If there's a secret plan to wrest the country from the Right Wing, then I say

NO MORE SECRET PLANS!

We are supposed to be a free and open society, with transparent and responsive government of the people, by the people, for the people, not for secret palns for undisclosed beneficiaries with unreported funders.

We are supposed to be a nation of LAWS, not men--something they left out at Regent College Law School. So let's start using the law to shut down these lawless pirates. Please! It's all we ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC