Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Can't Have Justice Both Ways

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-03 09:50 AM
Original message
Bush Can't Have Justice Both Ways

Bush Can't Have Justice Both Ways


By Peter Maguire


Peter Maguire has taught the laws of war at Columbia University and Bard College. He is the author of "Law and War: An American Story: and the forth-coming "Facing Death."

December 28, 2003


The discussion of an upcoming trial of Saddam Hussein was overshadowed by two appellate court decisions that serve as a sobering reminder to the Bush administration that presidential authority does not exist in a vacuum.


<snip>


Bush will soon learn that, in the unpredictable realm of political justice, he cannot have it both ways. The Bush administration would be wise to heed the warning of German legal theorist Otto Kirchheimer: "Justice in political matters is more tenuous than in any other field of jurisprudence, because it can so easily turn to mere farce."


Since 9/11, the administration has declared that "enemy combatants" captured in the "war on terrorism" will be tried before traditional military tribunals following cautious precedents laid down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1942 Quirin case dealing with Nazi saboteurs who landed on Long Island, and the 1946 case of the fallen Japanese general Tomoyuki Yamashita. The "dirty bomber," Jose Padilla, presented an unusual case: He was both an American citizen and an aspiring al-Qaida terrorist. Arrested on U.S. soil, Padilla was declared an "enemy combatant" and held for close to two years without charges and without seeing his lawyer.


<snip>


How ironic that the president who singlehandedly rolled back most of the international legal gains of the 1990s is now calling for a trial that will bear "international scrutiny." While a legitimate trial for Hussein could firmly establish his guilt in the eyes of his countrymen, any trial designed to "educate" the Iraqi people could quickly turn to farce as trials cannot be asked to teach historical lessons. Trials, at best, can only establish legal guilt or innocence.




more.......

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/ny-vpmag283601208dec28,0,5677615.story?coll=ny-lipolitics-print




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-03 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why the heck not? He gets away with everything else n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC