Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NJ Gun Laws Would have Frustrated Va. Tech Shooter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 09:48 AM
Original message
NJ Gun Laws Would have Frustrated Va. Tech Shooter
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/nj/20070419_Monica_Yant_Kinney___N_J__gun_laws_would_have_frustrated_shooter.html

The following are excerpts of a column a couple days ago in the Philadelphia Inquirer. The author had done a test a few months ago to see how easy it was to buy firearms in PA vs. NJ:


"After being told all I could do was look at Ed's Gun Shop in Deptford, NJ I spent $61 and waited eight weeks and six days just to receive my Firearms Purchaser Identification Card and handgun purchase permit.

... It took half the summer for my new pals at the Haddonfield Police Department to do their duty to serve and protect. In New Jersey, that meant grilling friends I listed as "character references" ... it meant a cop dropped by my house unannounced to ask my husband if he knew of - and approved of - my quest to bear arms.

...In New Jersey, Cho would have had to do a lot more than pass a quick criminal-background check. In NJ, ... Cho would have had to sign a consent form allowing police to review his medical records for mental-health treatment. In NJ, officers would have talked to doctors about whether he was a potential threat to himself or others. "If we feel someone is incompetent or incapacitated," Haddonfield Police Detective Sgt. Gary Pearce told me at the time, "we can deny." This part of the law, Miller explains, is designed "to keep the wrong people from getting their hands on guns."

... But in Virginia, by law, no one had the obligation to probe Cho's past or present woes, so no one did."
-------

(PA. is a big exporter of guns for criminals because they allow people to buy unlimited number of guns at one time. The next day, they claim they were stolen. A proposal to limit purchases to 2 per month per person hasn't moved at all in the PA. Legislature. You never know when you are going to need to buy more than 24 guns per year.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. My state from birth-17, and soon to be my state again
Thank the gods.

Gay marriage, gay adoption, anti-bullying laws, and sane gun control laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I recommended this thread
because you recognized the elephant in the room everyone else has chosen not to see. Thank you. I wrote about this in my Journal and sent a copy to Governor Kaine on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are you seriously suggesting going down the road where the police, friends and neighbors get to
determine if you get to excersize your basic rights and freedoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goondogger Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're begging the question
Edited on Fri Apr-20-07 10:34 AM by goondogger
implying that this detracts from "your basic rights and freedom." The 2nd Amendment does provide the right to bear arms, for the purpose of maintaining a WELL REGULATED militia. Regulations and rights can co-exist.

. . . but then that's the crux of the debate, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not really. Effective self defense is a basic right.
Its in the penumbra of the Constitution even if some do not like the 2nd amendment. That means handguns in todays world.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. As if we already don't live in a police state..
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. What about using those same restrictions on the 1st amendment? N-T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC