Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Obama Think Polls of Anti-War Sentiment Irrelevant?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 12:50 PM
Original message
Does Obama Think Polls of Anti-War Sentiment Irrelevant?
(Aug. 7) - New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has significantly widened her lead over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination in the wake of a dispute over handling foreign policy, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds.

The survey, taken Friday through Sunday, puts Clinton at 48% - up 8 percentage points from three weeks ago - and Obama at 26%, down 2 points. Among Democrats and independents who "lean" Democratic, former North Carolina senator John Edwards is at 12%.

The 22-point gap between the two leaders is nearly double the margin found in the July 12-15 poll.

"People are seeing her as the one ready to be president," says Mark Penn, Clinton's chief strategist, a perception he says was "accelerated" by the recent debate.

Bill Burton, Obama's spokesman, dismisses the findings. "National polls may go up and down before people actually start voting, but their irrelevance will not," he says.


How do you have polls both ways? I'm not sure his campaign can afford to dismiss this. And I'm a little disappointed by the mouthpiece's reaction.

<http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/clinton-widens-lead-over-obama-in-poll/20070807101809990002>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is today opposite day?
Hillary is the one who supported the war from the start, who has never repudiated her support for the war, and who has promised to keep troops in Iraq after she's elected.

Obama is the one who opposed the war, and who made a vague threat about going after the real enemy (even if he is hiding in Pakistan) instead of pursuing the war in Iraq, and talking to rather than threatening Iran.

But as long as Gannet keeps putting up the HILLARY IS GOD headlines, nobody seems to notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you.
If Hillary and Giuliani are the best we can do as Presidential candidates then we really are in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC