Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. has used the ultimate weapon of terror - A-bombs on Japan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:01 PM
Original message
U.S. has used the ultimate weapon of terror - A-bombs on Japan
Robert Scheer
Thursday, August 9, 2007



DURING A week of mayhem in Iraq, in which terrorists have rightly been condemned for targeting schoolchildren, it is sobering to recall that this week is also the 62nd anniversary of U.S. attacks that deliberately took the lives of thousands of children on their way to school in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As noted in the Strategic Bombing Survey conducted at President Harry Truman's request, when the bomb hit Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, "nearly all the schoolchildren were at work in the open," to be exploded, irradiated or incinerated in the perfect firestorm that the planners back at the University of California-run Los Alamos lab had envisioned for the bomb's maximum psychological impact.
The terror plot worked all too well, as Hiroshima's Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba recalled this week: "That fateful summer, 8:15 a.m. The roar of a B-29 breaks the morning calm. A parachute opens in the blue sky. Then suddenly, a flash, an enormous blast silence - hell on Earth. The eyes of young girls watching the parachute were melted. Their faces became giant charred blisters. The skin of people seeking help dangled from their fingernails. Others died when their eyeballs and internal organs burst from their bodies. Hiroshima was a hell where those who somehow survived envied the dead." Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japan's decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base whose anti-aircraft fire posed a higher risk. The target preferred by U.S. atomic scientists - a patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrain - was rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic.


-Snip-


You got to be honest with yourself dropping two A-Bombs on Japan was the ultimate act of terrorism, 9/11 doesn't even come close. I know Japan attacked us first but they hit Pearl Harbor which was a military target and we deliberately targeted their civilian population just to make a statement because it was known to our leaders at the time that Japan was on the verge of surrender. If you would like to read the entire article click on the link below.




http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/09/ED3PRF37F.DTL&hw=scheer&sn=001&sc=1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. If asked at the "Pearly Gates" if I support the use of those two A-bombs
My reply must be that after studying the subject and situation, yes. Those bombs stopped the war and probably saved lives on both sides in comparison to what it would have taken to occupy Japan. I grieve for the victims, but the Japanese were a valiant and competent foe and the battle to occupy the island would have caused even greater loss of life.

I say this again, a valiant and competent foe, equal to our weapons save one. Not like Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We wanted them to win quick before the Soviets took over the island from the north
The Russians still hold Japanese islands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed,
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 09:14 PM by jedr
for one , no one really could grasp the concept of what these bombs could do. When Truman was told of it's power ( even thought he had seen the detonation) I'm sure he had little concept as to it's power, nor did even the people on the Manhattan project.....it was virgin territory. Second , it was a different time and the Japanese war machine had used enough terrorism of it's own over the past 10 or so years . I have read theory that the Japanese would have surrendered anyway, and I doubt that, the Shinto code would have fought till the last woman and child had died. And lastly we recognized the Pandora's box we had opened and no sane individual would go though with it again. Life is not perfect, and if anything is to be taken from this, it is "Never Again".........Flame away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If anything should have been learned, it should have been "Never Again," yet
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 09:25 PM by indepat
hasn't "nuking 'em" been proposed a number of times by hard-liners itching to teach 'em a lesson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. One needs to question the sanity of those who say this.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. The United States tried to get Japan to surrender.
Before the first bomb and after the first bomb they wouldn't I had a very dear friend who said he and quite a few battalions of marines were waiting to invade Japan. They didn't like the Atomic bomb being dropped BUT THEY DIDN'T WANT to invade Japan and be killed either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC