from The Nation:
article | posted August 10, 2007 (web only)
Minnesota's Weeping Republicans David Rubenstein
With the collapse of the 35W bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, governor Tim Pawlenty's career took a big hit. Pawlenty, currently chair of the National Governors Association, has built a career on a no-tax-increase pledge, and he's risen in the ranks of national Republicans because of it. Among other feathers in his cap, he twice vetoed a gas-tax increase that would have provided money to the Department of Transportation, whose purview includes bridge inspection and repair.
Minnesota Republicans have insisted that--even though the bridge was deemed "structurally deficient" and severe corrosion and cracking had been noted almost ten years ago--there is no culpability here. Pawlenty so far has managed to keep the critics at bay. It fell to Carol Molnau, the head of Minnesota's Department of Transportation, to confront the outrage directly, with an impassioned defense of her agency during a press conference. "The dollars go into safety first," she said. There was "no neglect and no malice."
In fact, no one is alleging malice. But institutionalized neglect is what brought Molnau, Pawlenty and the entire post-Reagan Republican onslaught to power and kept it there for most of three decades. Now the chickens are coming home to roost.
"Infrastructure" became a buzzword in the early 1980s. Infrastructure renewal was seen as essential for "reindustrialization," which would be required in order to compete with a perceived trade threat from Japan. A 1981 study titled "America in Ruins," commissioned by the Council of State Planning Agencies, caused a stir in the national media when it observed that 20 percent of US bridges needed major work or replacement. Imagine! (Today an even larger percentage is considered "obsolete" or "structurally deficient.") ......(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070827/rubenstein