Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editorial: Saddam, Osama/Bush chose wrong enemy (* Ignored R Clarke)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:17 PM
Original message
Editorial: Saddam, Osama/Bush chose wrong enemy (* Ignored R Clarke)
http://www.startribune.com/viewers/story.php?template=print_a&story=4323598

As criticism was heaped on him, however, O'Neill said he regretted some of his more colorful characterizations of President Bush. That's vintage O'Neill; he always was one to say exactly what he thought and worry about it later.

But he isn't backing away from the policy points he made in the book, and he shouldn't, because his comments help illuminate just how badly the Bush administration messed up the war against terrorism prior to Sept. 11, 2001: It focused on Saddam Hussein, while it should have been working to destroy Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaida. This was not, as administration officials now claim, a continuation of President Bill Clinton's approach; it was a sudden, radical change.

The Bush administration was only a week old, O'Neill says, and already Iraq and Saddam had become a focus. After one meeting, Suskind writes, O'Neill wondered what was going on: "Was a multipronged assault on Saddam Hussein really a priority in early 2001? The dialogue today had been mostly about hows -- how to weaken or end Saddam's regime. With the administration at the start of its second week, O'Neill wondered, when, exactly, the whys -- why Saddam, why now, and why this was central to U.S. interests -- were to be discussed." Osama bin Laden wasn't even on the agenda.

He should have been. When Bush took office, the White House was told that a Predator drone had spotted Bin Laden several times recently in Afghanistan, and Richard Clarke wanted the suspended drone flights resumed to track the terrorist down and kill him.

<snip>

Consideration was not forthcoming; the Predators weren't put back in the air, and the administration sat on Clarke's attack plan. Meanwhile, Bush was contemplating his "multipronged assault on Saddam Hussein."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. in other words, Bush INC did NOTHING to prevent the events of 9/11
not only did he DO nothing, Bush spent 42% of his time on vacation, including the ENTIRE PRECEEDING MONTH. Dear God, if the American public knew the real truth about thse lying, incompetent fuckwads, they would be rioting in the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC