Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Scalia's Misjudgment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:17 AM
Original message
Justice Scalia's Misjudgment
This month may have been duck hunting season in Louisiana, but it was still a bad time for Justice Antonin Scalia to hunt ducks with Vice President Dick Cheney. Their trip came shortly after the Supreme Court agreed to hear Mr. Cheney's appeal of an order requiring him to disclose members of his secret energy task force. By going, Justice Scalia raised serious questions about his ability to judge the case impartially, and needlessly sullied his court's reputation.

(snip)

Justice Scalia told The Los Angeles Times that social contacts between judges and officials with cases pending are permissible when officials are sued in the course of their public duties. He compared his situation to justices' dining at the White House when a suit involving a president is pending. But vacationing with a litigant in a small group, outside the public eye, raises a far greater appearance of impropriety than attending a White House dinner. And Mr. Cheney's case involves not just any action, but one calling his integrity into question.

This is the second time in recent months Justice Scalia has cast doubt on his impartiality. Last year, he told a civic gathering that the decision about whether the Pledge of Allegiance should contain the words "under God" should be left to legislators, not courts, when that issue was headed to the court. After a litigant protested, Justice Scalia recused himself.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/opinion/25SUN3.html?ex=1075611600&en=f94286c9098e56b5&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. We all know.............
that the SCOTUS is as thick as thieves with the Bush administration, literally. The coup is complete, there is nothing to stop these neo-con bastards, that is until November. The coming election looms as one of epic proportions. These fascists must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would call Scalia the Most Dangerous Man in America
but there are so many others who would compete for that title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They Don't Even Try To Keep Up the Appearance of Propriety Anymore
They are so sure that it's in the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Rules are made for other people.
Pretty bad when a high supreme who shows no compassion in his rulings, suddenly raises the bar for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's what scares me, Andy
I don't believe they are worried about November at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Impeach the jerk
Of course, that'll never happen. He'd have to receive oral sex first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoblessRecovery Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Scalia simply has to recuse himself from Cheneys case
or stand as proof to be the crook in Cheney's back pocket that he really is. There is no grey area here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck
then it should be impeached, along with the rest of the Mallards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC