Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice [Thomas] says law degree 'worth 15 cents'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:35 AM
Original message
Justice [Thomas] says law degree 'worth 15 cents'
Source: AP

NEW HAVEN, Conn. - U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has a 15-cent price tag stuck to his Yale law degree, blaming the school's affirmative action policies in the 1970s for his difficulty finding a job after he graduated.

Some of his black classmates say Thomas needs to get over his grudge because Yale opened the door to extraordinary opportunities.

Thomas' new autobiography, "My Grandfather's Son," shows how the second black justice on the Supreme Court came to oppose affirmative action after his law school experience. He was one of about 10 blacks in a class of 160 who had arrived at Yale after the unrest of the 1960s, which culminated in a Black Panther Party trial in New Haven that nearly caused a large-scale riot.

The conservative justice says he initially considered his admission to Yale a dream, but soon felt he was there because of his race. He says he loaded up on tough courses to prove he was not inferior to his white classmates but considers the effort futile. He says he was repeatedly turned down in job interviews at law firms after his 1974 graduation.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071021/ap_on_re_us/yale_justice_thomas



Gee, you think the reason Clarence couldn't find a job was because he didn't play well with others? That's a trait highly prized by human resource managers everywhere, don'tchathink?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, he's worth 15 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Wrong he isn't worth a penny nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a stupid, ungrateful prick
The only way he'd have gotten into Yale Law School without affirmative action is if he'd gotten a job as a janitor there.

That's how closed things were until Johnson rammed the legislation through that blew the doors open.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. yup, what an asshole--boo hoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ummmm, Clarence, without your Yale Law degree ...
... would you be a Supreme Court justice today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cronyism? Priceless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. LOL! I thought the same thing when I read his remarks!
Yale law degree: 15 cents
Pubic hair and Coke: 85 cents
Apponting the loser candidate of right-wing neo-cons to the presidency over the will of American voters: priceless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. The "value" of education is what you make of it
In Thomas's case, .15 cents is probably inflated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor couldn't get a job after law school as a lawyer but
I don't think she blamed it on the value of her degree. She knew she was facing discrimination and just kept applying, and working, and eventually ran for office, became a judge, and became a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. I don't think I've ever heard that she carried grudge for the discrimination she had to deal with, though I'm sure she recognized what it was.

Clarence is just a pissed-off little boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmageddon Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. So the value of his law degree is slightly higher than his IQ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe he was turned down at law firms
for the same reason that he couldn't get into Yale without Affirmative Action. Or maybe he was turned down because he's such an obvious idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. This sort of blindness is what amazes me
about Justice Thomas. Thomas might read Franz Fanon for some insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. That's it in a nutshell
If he felt he was turned down at law firms because people were discriminating against him because of race, he should be fighting FOR affirmative action.

However, looking at his bio, I'm confused. He got his degree in 1974. From 1974 to 1977, he was an assistant attorney general of Missouri. Then he was an attorney for Monsanto. 7 years after getting his law degree, he was Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights in the US Dept. of Ed.

If there is some reason he should feel bitter about his career opportunities, I'm missing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. Appears to me that he is lying to justify his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. So he admits he was NOT qualified to get the degree?
He did not actually deserve to receive a degree from a prestigious university?

Color me surprised. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. He is utterly unfit to be on the Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Speaking of Alberto Gonzales
I sat across from him at a dinner when we were both in our twenties-he had just graduated Harvard and was clerking at a firm in Dallas, I had just completed medical school. He railed non-stop about the evils of equal opportunity, in spite of being the beneficiary of a full ride to Harvard undergrad and law. I wished him well in his career, and considered him an unthinking ungrateful prick incapable of self-awareness. Turns out my SAT scores were a tiny bit higher than his, but I got diddly-squat from Uncle Sam. I certainly don't begrudge levelling the playing field-but then to turn his back on the very successful program that made him what he is today is beyond the pale. Thirty years later, we seem to be sliding backwards into the goo and slime of the fifties as millions of poor minority kids go under-educated do to bastards like CT and AG. He is still incapable of self-examination and gratitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. What they both resent...
They both resent that they were not accepted by their "privileged" peers in law school and so they adopted the "privileged" mindset to cover up the resentment. They both need to look in the mirror. They are still not WASPs. Not White, not Anglo-Saxon, not even Protestant in a WASP way. Clarence Thomas was raised a Seventh Day Adventist and became an Episcopalian and then became a Catholic. He should have stuck with being an Episcopalian. Al Gonzales was born a Catholic and became an Evangelical Christian. WASPs are either Episcopalian, Lutheran, Methodist or Presbyterian. As in "European non-Catholic." Both cannot even convert correctly in their attempt to become a part of that which has always rejected them. And always will. Like it or not, the WASPs for the most part consider them "token" minorities. Nothing more.

Both reveal the resentment when they rail about affirmative action - as have millions of others, including women, affirmative action does not mean you will be accepted. Only admitted. Just the same, both did very well by affirmative action. And both are shameful in their attack on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. yes, and WASP should really be WASPM
White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, Male. Others get a chance to get into the door, but that doesn't mean they can (easily) get a place at the table.

-speaking as a former WASPF, now WASBuddhistF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. should be WASPHM
for White Anglo Saxon Protestant Heterosexual Male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Episcopalians are deluding themselves - they are Popeless Catholics.
They are only Protestant on a technicality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
45. But oh, what a fine show we can produce, with only a vestry and a few volunteers
and Old Father McGinty letting us have the barn -- um -- church for the evening!

"The Bishop of Rome hath no power in this realm of England," as the statute saith. We've got a cool Archbishop of Canterbury, Sarum, and St. John the Divine in NYC. Always a really good organist, and female priests and deacons, and heaven forbid, even bishops!

We have no theology, no eucharistic theory, and only are united by the prayer book -- what's not to like?!

We don't even have to go to confession -- we get absolved just like the Papists, only with a lot less fuss and bother, just kneel and pray the general confession. We can be transubstantiating Anglo-Catholics, memorialist Zwinglists, and as Arminian or Calvinist as we wish. Just act with decorum and sit back and enjoy the show! Hint: put the kneeler down when the service gets to "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord," and be prepared to stay on your knees for another 15-30 mins.

Oh, and on the Great Vigil of Easter, be prepared to get splashed with a lot of water as the baptismal vows are renewed! And on Maundy Thursday, be sure to wear clean socks/stockings, because you might be chosen to get your feet washed! Wouldn't want to go pulling a Wolfowitz on the congregation, now would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. If he was so much against AA why did he accept the nomination to the SCOTUS?
It was obiously an affirmative action choice on Poppy Bush's part to get a black conservative on the court. No one really believed he was the most qualified candidate and he certainly did not have the experience of a Thurgood Marshall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. At least he's honest. In his case it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Uncle Tom wasnt turned down for being black, he was turned down for being a selfish ignorant jerk.nt
Edited on Mon Oct-22-07 10:12 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. Clarence Thomas still pissing on everyone
That he feels ever slighted him. Never, ever could accept that maybe, just maybe, all his problems are self-inflicted.

The chip on his shoulder could be sawn into a nice redwood deck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. he is one bitter man . . .
bitter because he got in . . .
bitter had he not gotten in . . .

out to blame everyone because he was born black . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. Jeezus what a whiney little asshole he is
Probably the most unqualified supremo ever seated. How the fuck can he even walk with that redwood tree he's carrying around on his shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. Did he think that the fight for equal opportunity and access to employment was over because of Yale?
We were fighting for equal opportunity and access to education then and because of SCOTUS this year we will continue this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. To Clarence:
Stop bitchin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
25. The very reason he's on the SC is tokenism. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Not exactly.
He's there because Bush41 wanted a reliable conservative on the court, and the best way to get one past the Senate is to find one who was a member of some minority group. Bush 41 not only gets his reliable conservative, he gets undeserved credit for being "colorblind" while setting back race relations by decades in the process. To sum up, "playing the race card" is not the same as "affirmative action."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe he had trouble getting a job...
because potential employers recognized that he was a nasty crude idiot without a thought in his head, except whatever he'd copied from the boy next to him (on the Supreme Court, this has generally meant Scalia).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. Is anyone taking up a collection?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Stupid bastid. Never learned one of life's most important lessons. The
most important acceptance one can strive for is one's own. If on your deathbed you can say that you did the best you could for yourself, family, and the human race then you have the ONLY acceptance you need.

What a nasty, bitter, selfish, undignified, ungrateful pissant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. In a Frank Rich column a couple of weeks ago, he reported that
in Senator Danforth's book he said that he went to Yale to recruit Thomas for a job when Danforth was the Attorney General of Indiana. So Rich is saying that Thomas had a job offer before he left Yale and working as an Asst. Attorney General right out of college ain't bad. Thomas in his book said his degree was worthless after Yale because no one would hire him and he made it seem like he had to settle for the crummy job Danforth offered him after his Yale years as Thomas states happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. If not for AA, he would've been turned down at every college...
and thus never would've had the credentials to even apply for the jobs he was turned down for.

I wonder how he determined empiricallly that affirmative action was the reason he was turned down for jobs rather than because of his black skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
32. If he really began to think a law degree from Yale was worthless...
...because of affirmative action, then why the hell didn't he transfer to Howard?

Or...he could have joined the Peace Corps, Southern Christian Leadership Conference, NAACP, or even CORE.

I guess there's more money in quashing civil rights than promoting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ruben NAVARRETTE is another AA alum who turned on "White, Liberal males"
Yaas, those so-called "Liberal, elite" schools sure do turn out reactionary, ingrate a-holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. I think he is over-compensating for some extreme deficiencies-which he would not like to discuss
publicly.
All bullies are really cowards inside, and this disgusting display of bitterness and inability to take responsibilty for one's own shortcomings just fits the mold perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yeah, it wasn't until Clarence betrayed his Nation and People that he started making $$$$$
Now, look at him. He's rich and you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. The deeper Thomas digs the more stupid he sounds . . .
Thomas could become a rap star in the local whore house.

Mike Tyson has a ton more class than this fucking idiot. And that ain't no compliment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
40. feel free to give it back, Clarence. i'll spot you the $0.15. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. If he was truly turned down in job interviews it was most likely because of his attitude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
43. His self-loathing is the only honest and true thing about him (it is richly deserved)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. I suspect it's his lost integrity he laments so bitterly. "Out! Out! Damned spot!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
44. Clarabelle ain't worth two shits much less 15 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. I worked hard for mine in night school while raising a family. He's a jerk.
Thomas is many things, but you can certainly include "jerk" as one of them.

Talk about the ultimate practitioner of victimology. Second only to Rush Limbaugh as America's Perpetual Victim.

He needs to get over himself. What a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
49. Most of these posts are really racist
It is incredible that this type of language and characterization is being used on a progressive site against a black person. Grow up and get out of the grade school mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC