America's disappearing middle class

November 15, 2007

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IK15Dj01.html

Page 1 of 2
THE BEAR'S LAIR
America's disappearing middle class
By Martin Hutchinson

It is already clear that one of the great US election issues of 2008 will be the relative impoverishment of the American middle class, defined in the American rather than the British sense to include well established blue-collar workers with families and mortgages.

Republicans who ignore this problem will find themselves talking only to the winners, the top 1% in the income scale - laughably


inadequate as an electoral base. Democrats who propound the usual socialist nostrums to cure it will find themselves ardent proponents of an economics that doesn’t work. A new intellectual paradigm is required.

The declining share of low and moderate income workers in the American pie is undeniable; the relative share of such workers peaked as long ago as 1973. For those with only high school qualifications or less, their absolute earnings peaked in 1973 and have declined substantially since then. From 1973 to 1995, this appeared to be simply a case of the rewards for skills increasing, with low skilled workers suffering increasingly in terms of earnings and job losses compared to those with a bachelor’s degree or better. Since 2000, however, the paradigm has changed, with all sectors of the workforce losing ground in absolute terms, except for the top 1% who have gained essentially all of the modest gains in employee incomes under the George W Bush administration.

A Center for Economic and Policy Research study released this week shows that the share of “good jobs” in the US economy has fallen substantially during the 2001-07 business cycle, where a “good job” was defined as one that pays at least $17 an hour (the median wage rate in 1979) and offers employer-provided health insurance and a pension. While most of this deterioration has arisen from employers’ increasing failure to provide health care and a pension, the share of “bad jobs” with pay below $17 per hour and neither health care nor a pension has also increased in this business cycle, by 1.6 percentage points. ..........

Martin Hutchinson is a "free market" labor advocate, sounds like a contradiction and it is. He combines the ridiculous assumption made by Friedman and his cohorts with a keen understanding of the need for a Middle Class to ensure a vibrant economy. He is anti-socialism but pro-labor. A very odd mixture where he seems to contradict himself trying to stretch his "free market" philosophy to justify the need for a strong labor movement.

I suppose many of Friedman's converts will be straddling this fence in order to justify their "free market" ideologies while realizing that destroying a Democracy's Middle Class has serious repercussions for the economy.

He almost sees the light, if he would only take off those Friedman glasses.

Know did I not, this Martin Hutchinson, free trade shill of a columnist, Yoda was related.

His premise that we live in a world in which money is tight, that new projects are undertaken only when they clearly provide a clearly superior avenue to reward, does not explain the observation that there is adequate money to fund luxury homes and other avenues of conspicuous consumption, but there is never money to fund children's health insurance. By his logic, uninhabited spare bedrooms in 5000 square foot houses provide a superior avenue to reward than letting a sick child grow up to be a contributing member of society.

I have not perused much of Mr. Hutchinson's epistelations prior to this current moment, however, if they in totality possess this elevated degree of verbosity, one could highly recommend that the writer embundle his works and apply them to his person in a suppository manner. :silly:

Welcome to DU!