Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kathleen Willey is back to haunt the un dead!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Ronnie Roach Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:05 PM
Original message
Kathleen Willey is back to haunt the un dead!
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Kathleen Willey now staggers with the living dead.
(She’s backkkk!!!)
The time continuum of the physical universe must have hiccuped this morning, because I thought I was back in 1990’s. A passing car in front of my house was playing a, “Alice in Chains” song. I turn on my radio to a talk show and who is being interviewed? Kathleen Willey! For those don’t know who she is, go here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Willey
My favorite cliché is: The definition of insanity is, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Do the right wing really think drudging this old shit up again is going to work? No wonder they want Hillary to run for prez, they got a backlog of Clinton bashing merchandise languishing in some old warehouse in Gardena California.
Listening to her talk is great subject for pre-med students of abnormal psychology to study. Her incoherent speech patterns would give the most common person the perception that she is a nut job. Apparently she has book out that (Sic) exposes how the Clinton's not only killed her husband, but her kitty cat as well, it makes someone wonder who is the ghostwriter of this smear book? This woman is not capable writing a grocery list.
When the interviewer challenges her assertions about alleged wrongdoing, she will get indigent. Are her agents aware of this? She is going to become a media freak show because a crazy woman sells tickets. It has been a while since the Michael Jackson molesting trail and the media is hungry for another scandal. Forget about the crucial issues of our time! This is fun! Welcome back to the 90’s!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard her; she sounded kind of strange and quavery
Do you mean indignant? Or indigent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Roach Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ingignant
Sorry about that cheif
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sheesh. Not again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. She will get indigent.
Was she also a victim of Clinton's welfare reform, or is this right up there with series!1!!! and casting asparagus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's being interviewed on AM Hate Radio in Boston
WBZ (AM1030) has a new Glen Beck clone named Dan Rae, who hates America so much FOX News had him as a talking head the other day. He's been drooling all week over having a "figure of national importance like Kathleen Willey" on tomorrow's show.
What a freaking putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. She's making the rounds
Thom Hartmann had her on today at noon. Thom didn't challenge her much, but she sounded like a nutjob there.

Heard my local wingnut Fred Honzberger KDKA Pittsburgh advertising he as having her on today at 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, Clinton gave back her manuscript?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/staticarticles/article57498.html

Kathleen Willey: Clintons stole my manuscript
House burglary over weekend targeted copy of book days after details leaked to press

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 5, 2007
7:00 p.m. Eastern

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's lots to know about Kathleen Willey
Edited on Tue Nov-27-07 05:08 PM by kskiska
(snip)

According to Willey, during a meeting in the private study of the Oval Office, Clinton had embraced her tightly, kissed her on the mouth, fondled her breast and then placed her hand on his penis. Clinton denied assaulting Willey. This alleged event occurred on the same day that Willey's husband committed suicide. According to Linda Tripp’s grand jury testimony, Tripp felt Willey pursued a romance with Clinton from the start of her White House affiliation. Willey had speculated with Tripp as to how she might be able to set up an assignation between herself and the president. She routinely attended events at which Clinton would be present, wearing a black dress she believed he liked. According to Tripp’s testimony, she wondered if she and Clinton could arrange to meet in a home to which she had access, on the Chesapeake Bay.

Tripp also challenged Willey’s account of that Oval Office meeting. According to Tripp, Willey had arranged the meeting in part to see if her flirtation with Clinton might advance. After Clinton and Willey met privately, Willey rushed back to Tripp’s office to describe the meeting. According to Tripp, Willey “smiled from ear to ear the entire time” as she described the event. “She seemed almost shocked, but happy-shocked,” Tripp told the grand jury. Willey told Tripp that she and Clinton had "smooched," but made no mention of a sexual assault.

(snip)

Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling the FBI she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.

Willey remarried in November 1999 to Bill Schwicker. Now divorced, she resides in Powhatan County, Virginia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Willey

The Willey Letters (to Clinton)

Following is the text of letters from Kathleen E. Willey to President Clinton or his secretary – and one from the president to Willey. All but the first note date from after the November 29, 1993, meeting during which Willey says Clinton groped her. The White House released the letters on March 16 in an effort to bolster the president's insistence that his contacts with Willey were above board.

(sample)

Letter of October 18, 1994

Dear Mr. President,

Thank you so much for taking the time to meet with me. Since I've seen you, I have had the opportunity to talk with Mel French, Harlan Lee, the assistant chief of protocol, and Craig Smith. I hope to meet with Leon Panetta next.

As I said to you, I have invested almost three years with your campaign and administration and am not very willing to depart yet. I would like to be considered for an ambassadorship or a position in an embassy overseas. I now find myself with no encumbrances, with Shannon away at medical school and Patrick in college in North Carolina.

I feel confident that I would represent you and our country well if given the opportunity and hope you will consider my request.

Please accept my best wishes for your historic trip to the Mideast next week – I don't need to remind you of my willingness to help you in any way that I can.

Fondly,

Kathleen

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/willeyletters.htm

Another good article on Willey:
http://www.salon.com/news/1999/01/22newsa.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The problem with Kathleen
The problem with Kathleen wasn't that she was a credible witness the problem was that putting her on the witness stand would open her up to her past. Her past over the last 20 years or so and everyone everyone who had passed through the state capital.

On the best of sources-not a hit on her but just that there were far too many names who at least were, oh lets say, offered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC