Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look Who's Not Looking - The demise of the inspectors general program.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:26 PM
Original message
Look Who's Not Looking - The demise of the inspectors general program.
Look Who's Not Looking by Joshua Kurlantzick
The demise of the inspectors general program.
Post Date Friday, December 14, 2007


Over the past two weeks, two of the most high-profile inspectors general in government have faced public firing squads. As the Washington Post reported on its front page on Friday, Stuart Bowen, the inspector general tasked with investigating Iraq reconstruction, now faces an investigation himself. Several government agencies are examining charges that his office was involved in massive mismanagement and waste, the very sins he had been tasked with uncovering in Iraq. Most puzzlingly, over twenty-five of his employees earned more than General David Petraeus did last year.

Meanwhile, at the State Department, Inspector General Howard Krongrad recently resigned amidst charges that he blocked investigations into serious problems in Iraq. For months, Krongrad had been accused of everything from ignoring fraud in the construction of a US embassy in Baghdad to preventing his staff from looking into allegations of arms smuggling by the embattled military contractor Blackwater. In a particularly charming episode at a House hearing in November, Krongrad claimed that his brother was unaffiliated with Blackwater, then abruptly changed his story after supposedly learning, during the hearing, that his brother did in fact work there.

Alas, Krongrad and Bowen's cases are hardly unique. In Washington, inspectors general in each cabinet agency are supposed to serve a vital role, operating as the watchdogs inside the federal government who sniff out fraud, misconduct, self-dealing, waste, and a host of other criminal activities. But under the Bush administration--surprise, surprise--inspector general positions have been filled by White House loyalists or outright hacks, leaving agencies virtually unpoliced. And while the inspectors general do nothing, the administration says nothing. No one is watching the watchers.

During previous administrations, the White House appointed impartial inspectors general, many of whom had extensive backgrounds in the areas they would police. As a 2004 report by the Democrats on the House Committee on Government Reform revealed, in the Clinton administration, over 60 percent of Inspectors General had some past experience conducting audits--the essential task of an IG--and less than one-quarter of Clinton IG appointees had previous political experience, meaning they were not hardcore Clinton loyalists. Under Bush, the committee found that more than 60 percent of Bush IG appointees had previous political experience, like working for a Republican White House, and more than half of them had been contributors to President Bush or other GOP candidates. Less than 20 percent of the Bush Inspectors General had any previous auditing experience.

Given their background, it's hardly surprising that most Bush inspectors general are not exactly probing deep for problems. Krongrad and Bowen (who, it should be noted, was Bush's legal advisor during his governorship) are not even the most extreme cases. Janet Rehnquist, daughter of the former Supreme Court Chief Justice, wreaked major havoc as IG of the Department of Health and Human Services from 2001 to 2003. According to a story by the Associated Press, she delayed an audit of Florida's pension fund after then-governor Jeb Bush asked her to, and nearly all the deputy inspectors general in HHS left under her watch.

more...

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=a81e6008-4d85-4ad5-ac1a-0d7f32ee12cc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet another chapter to be written
in the Big Book of Failure that is the B*sh Administration....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. And, now this admin want to control the JAG Corps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They are power hungry despite the fact that they're gone soon.
Unless they have plans for that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I am worried. No one go through the trouble to amass power and give it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Astonishingly power hungry for people who are supposed to be gone in one year.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Too busy stealing to govern. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC