Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Ritter: If Only Saddam Had Injected HGH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:51 PM
Original message
Scott Ritter: If Only Saddam Had Injected HGH
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19369.htm

If Only Saddam Had Injected HGH

By Scott Ritter

17/02/08 "Antiwar" -- -- The recent spectacle of Congressional hearings on the alleged use of steroids and/or Human Growth Hormone (HGH) by Roger Clemons, a professional baseball player nicknamed "the Rocket," throws into question the viability and functionality of a Congress controlled by the Democratic Party. The House Government Reform Committee, chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-California), carried out its own made-for-television version of Court TV, grilling the All Star pitcher and his former trainer over their contradictory statements as to whether or not Clemons actually was injected with a banned performance enhancing substance. While this hearing was underway, thousands of miles away, in Iraq , American service members continued the ugly business of occupying Iraq . That Waxman would abuse his position by pursuing such trivia while Americans continued to fight and die in a war built exclusively on a framework of lies is disturbing.

snip//

To his credit, Representative Wexler pressed home his point, namely that Condi Rice had lied when she helped make the case for war against Iraq by selectively citing certain intelligence information while suppressing others. Secretary Rice, of course, denied any wrongdoing, leaving America with a curt point-counterpoint exchange which served little purpose when it comes to the matter of the search for truth and accountability through oversight. When Roger Clemons denied the charges leveled at him, the robust overseers of Congressional Constitutional mandate who populate the Government Reform Committee subjected him to a withering round of cross-examination full of recrimination and doubt. Following Wexler's brief moment of inquiry, Condi Rice was let off without further reproach.

Clearly there are discrepancies between the charges leveled by Wexler and the responses offered by Rice. That the compendium of alleged false statements comes from an independent, non-governmental entity (the Center for Public Integrity) should not serve as a roadblock to further investigation and hearings into the matter: the Government Reform Committee was acting in response to an independent investigation, the Mitchell Report, authorized not by Congress, but rather the Commissioner of Baseball. Unlike the Mitchell Report, however, the matter of Bush administration prevarication concerning the false case made for war in Iraq delves not into the lives of private citizens, where the consequences get no bigger than inflated sports statistics, but rather the words and actions of elected officials which influenced public opinion and the will of Congress in a manner which has cost hundreds of billions of dollars and several thousand American lives.

Congress shouldn't have to wait for a private organization like the Center for Public Integrity to do its job for it. The misrepresentation of fact, fabrication of falsehoods, and outright lies the Center for Public Integrity documents are all a matter of public record, most of which were derived from statements made before Congress itself.

That Congress puts the so-called integrity of a game ahead of its own Constitutional mandate of oversight of legitimate governance is a travesty. That this travesty is carried out in the face of a pledge by a Democratic-controlled Congress to effectively and responsibly carry out its duty to investigate how and why our nation went to war with Iraq is not only incomprehensible, but reprehensible.

Perhaps if Saddam Hussein had been accused of injecting HGH instead of hiding WMD, Congress would have stepped up to the plate, so to speak, and dug deep into the truth of the matter. Henry Waxman, as well meaning as he is, sits at the head of a legislative process which has lost touch with reality and purpose. Pandering to the no-risk approach of non-governance by pursuing "The Rocket" and allegations of HGH abuse, while ignoring the high-risk demands of legitimate government by pursuing matters pertaining to how the Bush administration manufactured evidence of illusory Iraqi rockets tipped with imagined WMD, represents the ultimate indictment of a Congress, and legislative process, that long ago lost touch with its ultimate purpose of being: the pursuit of the best interests of the American people through the defense of the rule of law as set forth by the United States Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly, I Can't Believe Congress Can Find Time To Investigate
Baseball but not illegal wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shows what Congress' priorities are
Remember when Nancy Pelosi was talking about "doing the business of the American people?" Was this what she was talking about???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ironic that that IS what SH was trying metaphorically, to do with lies about WMD.
Lies, lies, lies on soooooooooo many empirical levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Yankees might have signed him, and he could have worked out his
murderous rage on the ballfield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you, Mr. Ritter--and Babylonsister! I switched on the radio, on my way
to work the other day, to C-Span, and couldn't believe this crap I was hearing from Waxman's committee. With a list of "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Bush Junta so long you could wrap it around the planet and not see the end of it, they were wasting precious investigation resources, committee time, air time and the opportunity to inform and educate the American people, on harassing a baseball player!

I wondered if anybody else had noticed this outrage. I guess somebody did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Are you kidding? the m$m actually covered it non-stop for over an hour,
yet Valerie Plame, DSM, etc., etc., crickets. It was beyond frustrating and such a waste. Some posted wondered if all channels had now turned into court TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. For what it's worth--the day after the Clemens hearings......
....I read that Waxman said they had not wanted to have the hearing, because they already had all the testimony they needed, but that Clemens and his attorney INSISTED they have the hearing so that Clemens could clear his name, or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I cannot wait for the Dems to take control of Congress!!
Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. We need to send a strong message to congress that we the people are not being heard
I know of no better way than supporting Nancy's challenger Shirley Golub!

Nancy faces a challenge that could make her lose her seat due to her taking Impeachment off the table,

that is if we support her opponent I have sent her money and will do so again. Now if we had a opponent

to Jane Harmon(radical terrorist act sponsor) also she is mine I'd love to see her go but hers is one of the

richest MIC districts!










Ich bin eine Colbertler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC