Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exxon: Rebuffing The Rockefellers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:53 AM
Original message
Exxon: Rebuffing The Rockefellers
WP: Rebuffing The Rockefellers
By Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 29, 2008; D01

Exxon Mobil yesterday fended off a revolt by descendants of company founder John D. Rockefeller Sr. at the firm's annual meeting in Dallas and defeated a shareholder resolution that would have divided the jobs of chairman and chief executive, now both held by Rex W. Tillerson. The proposal, which was approved by 39.5 percent of shareholders, was one of four resolutions that garnered substantial shareholder support from the extended Rockefeller family, state pension funds, institutional holders and individuals, though all of the measures fell short of the majority needed. The other resolutions would have forced the company to give shareholders some say over executive pay, prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, draw up a plan to cut its own greenhouse gas emissions and turn its attention toward clean energy resources.

The meeting cast Exxon's founding family in an unusual role: dissident shareholders.

"It is very rare for us to do something public," Peter O'Neill, Rockefeller's great-great-grandson, said in an interview after yesterday's shareholders meeting. But at one of the family's semiannual meetings in the New York area, he said, nearly all the Rockefeller descendants had agreed to back four shareholder resolutions opposed by the company. "For 73 out of 78 adult descendants to come together and say we're going to stand up is a big deal," O'Neill said. "Obviously we were concerned about some of their policies and the pace of change." The focus of the family's concern has been climate change and its consequences for the planet and the company, and Tillerson nodded to climate issues in his opening remarks yesterday. But Tillerson said that "25 or 30 years from now, the world is still going to have to use oil and natural gas. Whether people like it or not, that's a fact."

O'Neill said the family began conveying a different view to Exxon senior managers five years ago. Though family members have had "multiple meetings" with Exxon executives, board members have refused to meet them. On only one occasion did Tillerson and the previous chief executive, Lee Raymond, grant an audience to members of the family, and that was to David Rockefeller -- the former chief executive of Chase Manhattan Bank and a grandson of John D. Rockefeller -- along with one of his daughters, Neva Rockefeller Goodwin. But the family stayed focused on Exxon. More than a century after John D. Rockefeller retired, Exxon remains the family's biggest single holding, O'Neill said. This year, the Rockefellers decided to take to the floor of the annual shareholders meeting, strongly supporting the resolution separating the chief executive and chairman positions and sponsoring the resolution urging Exxon to come up with targets for greenhouse gas emissions and a strategy for developing clean energy resources....

From the floor of the Dallas auditorium yesterday, Goodwin -- author of an introductory college microeconomics textbook and co-director of Tufts University's Global Development and Environment Institute -- said that members of the extended Rockefeller family "have become seriously concerned about the future of Exxon." She said that "increased CO2 in the atmosphere will cause weather disasters that . . . will certainly have a huge and harmful impact on the global economy itself, on which the success of a giant global company such as Exxon Mobil so largely depends." Goodwin said that the company's forecasts of strong oil-demand growth from developing nations were inconsistent with the consequences of climate change from growing greenhouse gas emissions. "Those nations will be the ones most adversely affected by climate change," she said.

Yet Goodwin's resolution proposing that the company establish a task force to study climate change and opportunities for Exxon to develop sustainable energy technologies won only 10.4 percent of the votes cast....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/28/AR2008052803162_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Theater of Greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. smells like fear--they want to distance themselves from their profitable Frankenstein
they must think the villagers are about to start gathering torches and pitchforks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. no word on David Rockefeller, one of the Dons of the financial elite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. We need to hear "NATIONALIZE OIL INDUSTRY" and ELECTRIC CARS . . .
from Congress and the public ---

They are still able to ingnore SUV's piling up and the search for cars with improved
gas mileage . . .

something GM obviously doesn't care about as they pursue oil industry interests --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC