Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Ritter: 'Where Are the Weapons of Mass Destruction?’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 12:23 PM
Original message
Scott Ritter: 'Where Are the Weapons of Mass Destruction?’
from Truthdig:



'Where Are the Weapons of Mass Destruction?’
Posted on Aug 11, 2008


By Scott Ritter

In the past two decades I have had the opportunity to participate in certain experiences pertaining to my work that fall into the category of “no one will ever believe this.” I usually file these away, calling on them only when events transpire that breathe new life into these extraordinary memories. Ron Suskind, a noted and accomplished journalist, has written a new book, “The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism,” in which he claims that the “White House had concocted a fake letter from Habbush , to Saddam , backdated to July 1, 2001.” According to Suskind, the letter said that “9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had actually trained for his mission in Iraq—thus showing, finally, that there was an operational link between Saddam and al Qaeda, something the Vice President’s Office had been pressing CIA to prove since 9/11 as a justification to invade Iraq.”

This is an extraordinary charge, which both the White House and the CIA vehemently deny. Suskind outlines a scenario which dates to the summer and fall of 2003, troubled times for the Bush administration as its case for invading Iraq was unraveling. I cannot independently confirm Suskind’s findings, but I, too, heard a similar story, from a source I trust implicitly. In my former line of work, intelligence, it was understood that establishing patterns of behavior was important. Past patterns of behavior tend to repeat themselves, and are thus of interest when assessing a set of seemingly separate circumstances around the same source. Of course, given the nature of the story line, it is better if I introduce this information within its proper context.

In the summer of 2003 I was approached by Harper’s Magazine to do a story on the work of the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), a CIA-sponsored operation investigating Saddam’s weapons-of-mass-destruction programs in the aftermath of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. David Kay, a former International Atomic Energy Agency inspector who served briefly in Iraq in 1991 and 1992, was at that time the head of the ISG. By October 2003 the group had prepared a so-called interim report, which claimed to have eyewitness evidence of Iraqi WMD-related activities prior to the invasion in March. The key to the ISG’s interim report was the testimony of “cooperative sources,” Iraqis of unstated pedigree purportedly providing the ISG with unverifiable information. With one exception—an Iraqi nuclear scientist who had been killed by coalition forces—David Kay failed to provide the name or WMD association of any of the sources he used for his report, making any effort to verify their assertions impossible. Many of the senior Iraqis who had openly contradicted Kay’s report were, and still are to this day, muzzled behind the walls of an American prison in Baghdad. But there was another group of Iraqis, the former scientists and technicians involved in Iraq’s WMD programs who were known to have been interviewed by the ISG, and who were released back into Iraqi society. These scientists held the key to deciphering the vague pronouncements of the ISG interim report, and could help to distinguish between fact and fiction.

Many of these scientists remained intimidated by their ISG experience, which often involved lengthy imprisonment and harsh interrogation. Loath to run afoul of their American occupiers, and tethered financially to a monthly stipend designed to keep them from exporting their WMD know-how out of Iraq (and, it has been suggested, from talking too freely with the media), these Iraqi scientists possessed a wealth of data which was difficult to tap into. In my own effort to research the veracity of David Kay’s assertions, I made use of my connections within the community of former Iraqi WMD scientists to try to gain access to what they knew. One in particular, who, because of ongoing security concerns, will be identified only as Mohammed, worked to facilitate my visit, arranging for meetings with Iraqis who possessed firsthand knowledge about not only the past WMD programs but also the ongoing efforts of the ISG. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080811_where_are_the_weapons_of_mass_destruction/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, there are WMDs here, in the USA ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Are you referencing the :"leaking" nerve gas at the depot in my home town
of Richmond, Kentucky? David Kay eventually in what appeared to me total exapperation wrote the report that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This was of course already known by the Bushistas before the invasion of this innocent country and is a war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes ...
EDIS Number: HZ-20080712-17551-USA
Date / time: 12/07/2008 08:46:40
Event: HAZMAT
Area: North-America
Country: USA
State/County: State of Kentucky
City: Richmond

Number of Deads: None or unknow
Number of Injured:None or unknow
Damage level: Minor

Description:

Army officials confirmed Friday that sarin nerve agent is leaking from a container at the Blue Grass Army Depot. A mobile laboratory conducting a routine check within one of the chemical agent storage igloos tested positive for the nerve agent GB (sarin). The leak was in the same igloo that sprang a leak last August, the Army said in a press release. “It may be the same leak reopening, it's a high possibility,” said depot public affairs officer Richard Sloan. The igloo, which is a 90-foot-long concrete bunker covered in dirt, contains three GB ton containers and several secondary waste drums. The igloo has been continuously filtered and monitored daily since the leak was identified and sealed in August, and officials stressed that no chemical agents have escaped the containment igloo. “It's still at the bottom of the detection level,” Sloan said. “It poses no risk whatsoever to the general public or the environment.” Workers are planning to inspect the ton container on Monday and will weigh their options for possible correction methods.

Found a copy of report on DU

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. We have one sick government....
About half our population must be unable or unwilling to bother to find out what has been happening while they were sleeping.

I have had some extremely depressing conversations lately with people that "don't see a problem".?! There is no way to tell them that abortion or gays isn't the worst thing that has happened to our country??? There is no way they will vote for Obama.

I'm reading Suskind's book now and it too is depressing but interesting. Nearly half way through it.

Ritter has got to know that his e-mails are monitored, he sure took some chances talking to the Iraqi Mohammad, must have had code names or something. I sometimes wonder tho about old Saddam loyalist or at least worked closely with him and how much you can rely on their accounts. For sure no WMDs were found!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We have fascism.
To these advocates of fascism this government is working fabulously well. And it WILL continue. Obama will not stand in the way. This is the greatest threat to the U.S.A. in our entire short history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC