Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Serious question: Did McCain pick Palin because of creeping dementia?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
wcepler Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 04:46 PM
Original message
Serious question: Did McCain pick Palin because of creeping dementia?
Palin is a zero. She's not even loose cannon. She's more like a loose TV sitcom.

The corporate media spin is that this was an extraordinarily clever choice Indeed; some people speculate it was really a Karl Rove choice.

But what if it was 100% a McCain choice AGAINST the advice of all his advisor's? Indeed, what if it was a choice McCain made for, let's just say, intensely personal reasons.

And what might these very personal reasons be?

Well, two come to mind (however painful it is to look at such things), and both of them have to do with his age. But it's not only his age; it’s also his discombobulated appearance, fumbled talking, sniggering sexual remarks whenever he appears in public, and ogling his VP.

In short, one very real possibility is that this was a creeping Alzheimer’s choice.

The other very real possibility is that it was a male menopause choice.

Look, if someone makes a decision that is indescribably stupid (such as Sarah Palin for VP), you have to wonder if something fundamentally defective or secretive is going on in the decision making process.

Don't forget, McCain's first wife was a beauty queen, and don't forget McCain's SECOND wife was a beauty queen, and now "his" 3rd beauty queen (albeit topless) who he wants for his VP? Is there a pattern here or is there a pattern here?

We also shouldn’t discount the bogglingly inappropriate and public fact that McCain has sex on the brain (hey, he finds ways to leer and sneer about sex in virtually every public speech!). Sure makes you wonder what ‘ol John has been up to during the pre-Palin years.

In any case, corporate PR and Republican convention spin aside, Palin is beyond belief. Most of her speech was defensively talking about her family. Duh.

The sad, brutal fact is that Sarah Palin is going to have a VERY brief free ride. She's already the clown d'jour on most late nite talk shows. And this is just the beginning. Probably 95% of America knows in their heart of hearts (Republicans included) that, like an Alaskan vein of gold, Sarah Palin is going to be a treasure trove of sleaze, naughty relationships, family dysfunctionality, and general air headism.

Some folks think we should all turn the other way and decorate her past (and present) with flattery and fantasy virtues and accomplishments, but since this lady is now in the national fast lane, thanks to the personal eccentricities (and lusts?) of John McCain, let the buyer beware.

In fact, it is our life and death responsibility to shine the reality spotlight on McCain, Palin, and the exceedingly odd relationship between these two people, and IF we find sexual funny business, we should bloody well shout it out to the planet. And if we find empirical evidence that John McCain is slipping into profound irrationality, we MUST examine the possibility that traces of dementia are starting to appear.

The litmus test in all of this is McCain's choice of Sarah Palin for VP, which (this writer predicts) is going to turn out to be an act of suicide for the Republican Presidential campaign.

Yes, you can sew together a cloak of minor political capital such as her grade school belief that global warming is NOT man made and her comical religious fanaticisms (both of which will appeal to similar quasi humans), but the truth will out, and already the truth is that this woman virtually doesn't exist when it comes to substantive adult maturities and political experience. The more you look into her past, is the more your find vulgarity, cruelty to animals and children, a mindless contempt for the environment (i.e., our one and only human race environment), and frightening illiteracy.

You really can't even imagine this fatuous woman having ANY kind of depth conversation with another head of state. She would have to have someone in the background holding up cue cards to keep the conversation going. Of course, one wonders how much the same is already the case, and will be INCREASINGLY be the case for John McCain.

So what do we have here: an "intellectually challenged" man in the grip of male menopause who has the hots for a fantasy high school student?

Never in the history of our country have we had such a lose/lose combo of clown like defectiveness.

Feel compassion for either or both of them if you wish, but in the name of God, keep these two losers away from the Presidency and Vice Presidency of the United States of America!

Contrasting them to the presidential and vice presidential experience, intelligence, and morality of Barrack Obama and Joe Biden is like comparing a half eaten, wet hot dog to a five star restaurant.
**********************************************************************

W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

<http://theliberationofrealism.blogspot.com/>

Ps: It would be nice if the name “Sarah Sitcom” caught on. You know, good bumper sticker, etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, he picked her cause
he's just plain.. creepy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think his dimentia has progressed to the point the campaign picked her
When she was introduced last Saturday, no one looked more surprised than McCain did.

The old McCain, the one the MSM is in love with, would never have allowed a Rove disciple to run his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. She was chosen in part so the Republicans can rid themselves of both neocons and fundamentalists...
or at least mute their influence and remove them from the forefront of the Party. They'll do this by having John McCain be defeated and Sarah Palin humiliated. Similar purges have been done before: in '64 when the Republicans rid themselves of the Goldwater wing of conservatism, and in '72, when the Democrats did the same with the liberal, anti-war wing personified by McGovern.

Think of it, once this election is over, if McCain loses as big as some sources believe he may, and Palin is humiliated beyond any measure we can imagine today, there's no possibility that either a neocon or a fundamentalist will be on the Republican ticket in 2012. I believe that's what the monied interests are angling for with this odd couple pairing.

I'd venture to say, as well, the Republicans don't want to win this election because losing it is their only hope to remain viable in the years to come.

Face it, their only hope is for McCain to lose. George W. has left the nation in such a shambles, it's difficult to imagine how anyone can set things aright. Another four years of McSame would doom the Republicans -- and they know it. Their best hope is for a Democrat to inherit W's disasters. Then, whichever way it goes -- if the Democrat can fix the problems, or if they prove uncorrectable in one or two terms -- the Republicans may be in a position to stage a comeback. It may take more than two or even four election cycles, but they'll have the opportunity. Unless, that is, McSame is elected, and all the disasters coming down the pike end up piled unequivocally on their doorstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wcepler Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. food for thought
Wow. Now THAT is food for thought! Thank you, thank you.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Palin was a campaign choice, not a governing choice. Heaven help us if she ever does rule us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Palin Pick is part of the Duming Down of America
They are proving that facts, intellegence, etc just don't matter. As long as you play ball with the Reich - you too can be a winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You could at least spell "Dumb" correctly
...unless you meant to spell it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. We could just conjecture and conjecture . . .

. . . the truth won't be out until the Election crushes the McCain campaign on November 4.

For myself, I believe the decision was McCain's, who still fancies himself as somebody who thinks "outside the box."

This one's outside the box and in the dumpster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. He picked her because he's a dirty old man who likes to have the skirts around him...
Hugh Hefner wanna be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. what makes you think he was ever any more intelligent or less impulsive?
it's not like he was ever a genius.

in fact, the whole "maverick" thing is good cover for a tendency to make oddball decisions.
or, as he's rich, call it his "eccentricities".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Total desperation move
Good for a short jittery burst of enthusiasm, then a terrible crash.

She's like an energy drink - lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. This article nailed it! Worth reading several times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deeply saddened that the Republican establishment that includes
people like Lugar, Warner, Pawlenty, Collins, Smith, Coleman, et.al. would stand by and allow this to play out. What happened to a belief that American politicians were the best and brightest or that we people that tell bold untruths should be drummed out of the process? Have the Neocons silenced their detractors? Is the democracy a failed cause? Putin, Sarkozy, and the rest of the world are looking carefully at what is transpiring and making judgments and plans for the worst. America will not survive if she ascends to any degree of leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. I suspect that rover
had something to do with this. After nixing lieberman, he found a 'star,' that is, someone who'd feel to repubs (some, if not many) like a bright light.

She's NOT a zero; she's attractive, smart, new, good on her feet, and full of the stuff the far right loves. She got and will get a lot of attention, and enable reps to go on without discussing substance. Media will go along with this, and so will some dems.

We should harp on their lack of substance, as did O and Joe today, and hope that indes and undecideds will see the light, and that we and the states can keep the thieves away from ballots/numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. John didn't pick her: ROVE did.. enuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC