Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boogiemen..How Lee Atwater Perfected the G.O.P.'s Appeal to Racism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:52 AM
Original message
Boogiemen..How Lee Atwater Perfected the G.O.P.'s Appeal to Racism

By ISHMAEL REED

One of the founders of the Neo-Confederate organization called The League of the South, which will probably renew its call for secession of the southern states if Barack Obama wins, was the late Grady McWhiney. In his book, “ Cracker Culture, Celtic Ways of the Old (University of Alabama, 1988), he traced 'cracker' to the Gaelic word craic--still used in Ireland and anglicized in spelling to 'crack'--and said it meant 'entertaining conversation. ' (Folk etymology had had it that cracker came from cracking or pounding corn, or using whips to drive cattle. He was quoted in the Irish Literary Supplement. "Celts and Southerners, in Dr. McWhiney's view, are pastoral groups with a taste for gambling, drinking, 'raucous music, ' dancing, hunting, fishing and horse and dog racing. They are lazier than the English and Northerners and cling to an easily offended sense of honor, naturally linked to 'a propensity to violence. '. . . " He resigned from the League of The South complaining that it had been taken over by “'the dirty fingernail crowd. . . . ’”

I learned first hand about how the media buckled under when self described crackers seized the Republican party. The kind of people who even use hot sauce on ice cream. Who, like South
Carolinian Lee Atwater, love black culture, especially the
“raucous” music Rock and Roll, but have issues with its creators. (In this tradition, check out Sarah Palin’s Hands-in-the-air moves on the last “Saturday Night . “)

During the administration of Bush One, I was invited to do commentaries on NPR’s “All Things Considered. ” After the infamous Willie Horton ad ran, an ad that criticized a Massachusetts program that led to the furlough of a black rapist and murderer, Willie Horton, and an ad that some contend caused the defeat of democratic nominee, Michael Dukakis, I wrote a commentary about how the ad would backfire on Bush, One and Lee Atwater. The commentary was rejected and that was the end of my career as a commentator on NPR. Atwater also employed tactics that were used earlier by

Richard Nixon, one of his admirers, and are being used in the current campaign by Senator McCain. Painting one’s opponent as unpatriotic ( a socialist, even) and packaging his wealthy clients as ordinary Joes like Bush One pretending to enjoy pork rinds and cowboy boots. Atwater’s playing of the media is also a current strategy.

A number of news entertainers have repeated the McCain charge that the media are in the tank for Obama. Two academic studies and one by Lexis Nexus have disputed the media’s supposed love of Obama. I watched three hours of Morning Joe on Oct. 20th. Much of the time was spent analyzing General Colin Powell’s endorsement of Barack Obama and debating whether it was given because both were black.

Pat Buchanan, member of the media that’s so cozy with Barack Obama is on MSNBC all day championing the cause of Senator McCain. During this show he joined Tucker Carlson, Howard Kurtz, and others who believe that the media love Obama. An Obama representative was riddled with questions, while Rick Davis, McCain’s man, and Atwater impersonator, wasn’t questioned at all. The male commentators expressed their having the hots for hot Sarah Palin without mentioning Troopergate. Even Lawrence O’Donald was panting about the Vice Presidential candidate’s measurements.

William Ayers was brought up without citing the support of the projects on which Ayers and Obama worked by the Annenberg family, a Republican family that supports McCain. None of the media has followed up on Obama’s listing of Republicans and conservatives who served on the same board as Ayers and Obama. On Oct. 24, Joe Scarburough and Mika Brzezinski chided The New York Times for suggesting that there were hints of racism in John McCain’s campaign. I suppose they missed the ad coupling Barack Obama with Paris Hilton and Rudolph Giuliani’s playing of the Willie Horton card.

Here’s the script of a Giuliani’s Robo call:

“Hi, this is Rudy Giuliani, and I'm calling for John McCain and the Republican National Committee because you need to know that Barack Obama opposes mandatory prison sentences for sex offenders, drug dealers, and murderers. It's true, I read Obama's words myself. And recently, Congressional liberals introduced a bill to eliminate mandatory prison sentences for violent criminals -- trying to give liberal judges the power to decide whether criminals are sent to jail or set free. With priorities like these, we just can't trust the inexperience and judgment of Barack Obama and his liberal allies. “

Walter Isaacson, appearing on this typical all white cable panel adjudicating what’s racist and what’s not, agreed with Mika and Joe about the Times charge against McCain.

This is the same Walter Isaacson who traveled to the headquarters of David Horowitz, an ideological thug, and begged forgiveness after Jack White called Horowitz a racist. Mika Brzezinski chimed in that it’s hard to run against an African American candidate, which probably explains Governor Tom Bradley and Senators Harvey Gant and Harold Ford.

The fact that we hear more about Rev. Wright than the preachers who embrace John McCain, Rev. Hagee, is an example of how the right has intimidated the media. For the same reason, we hear more about Bill Ayers than about about Sarah Palin’s ties to the an Alaska outfit that advocates secession. the Alaska Independence Party whose founder, Joe Volger , made comments that in comparison make those fulminations of Rev. Wright, a marine, seem tame. “AIP founder, Joe Vogler, made incendiary comments in 1991, in an interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, according to the History Channel. He said:"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, " Vogler said in the interview, in which he talked extensively about his desire for Alaskan secession, the key goal of the AIP.

"And I won't be buried under their damn flag, " Vogler continued in the interview, which also touched on his disappointment with the American judicial system. "I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home. "

At another point, Volger advocated renouncing allegiance to the United States. In the course of denouncing Federal regulation over land, he said:"And then you get mad. And you say, the hell with them. And you renounce allegiance, and you pledge your efforts, your effects, your honor, your life to Alaska. "

The Robo call which is being used by McCain’s campaign was one of Atwater’s tools. Slyly disparaging your candidate by asking a series of leading questions. When McCain’s Robo calls imply that Obama and Atwater planned the bombing of the Pentagon, some of the recipients of these calls are so ignorant that they probably think the 9/11 attack and not the 60s Weatherman activities that occurred when Obama was eight years old.

Predictably in the final weeks code terms like Welfare and Socialism are being bellowed by McCain and Palin. These are the standard Atwater tricks. Slithering beneath McCain’s speeches is the idea that Obama is going to take the hard earnings of people like tax dodger, Joe the Plumber, and give it to lazy black people whom whites have been told by the media for decades that blacks receive all of the welfare, when it would take a couple of hundred years for blacks to attain the kind of subsidies and government support that whites have received. If one refers to these appeals as racist, the little Goebbelses surrounding McCain’s campaign would plead innocence, another leaf from the Atwater handbook. Only Rick Davis has expanded the technique by accusing the accusers of racism.

Among Atwater’s clients was George Bush. So powerful is the Bush family, two of whose presidential campaigns were managed by Lee Atwater, that they were able to crush the promotion of Kitty Kelley’s devastating portrait of the Bushes “The Family” for which she received Pen Oakland’s censorship award.

The Bush family has even been able to wuss Hollywood. In Oliver Stone’s “W, ” George Bush is portrayed as a clownish loveable and clumsy dope and reformed party boy who was misled by incompetent and sinister advisors into believing that Iraq harbored weapons of mass destruction, not someone who was bent on invading the country from the beginning of his presidency WMDs or no WMDs.

Bush One is portrayed as a wise leader, a Solomon, despite his connection to the Iran Contra scandal his support of Central American death squads, the Willie Horton campaign and his invasion of Panama that caused 3, 000 Panamanian lives. Nothing is said in “W” about the slaughter in the desert of thousands of retreating Iraq soldiers on “The Highway of Death. ” Lee Atwater is barely identified in this film. In his attempt to be objective, Stone chickened out.

Stefan Forbes, a young film maker with little money used a small HD camera, the HYX-200 edited his film, ” The Boogie Man, The Lee Atwater Story, ” on a Macbook Pro laptop, the kind of brilliant use of technology that will lead to the decline of Hollywood in the same way that cyberspace is undercutting the flaccid Jim Crow corporate media where Joe Barbies and Jane Bimbos are awarded the status of journalists, and they have the temerity to ridicule the vacuity of Sarah Palin. Film maker Stefan Forbes, an outsider, has done what corporate Hollywood has failed to do with his “The Boogieman, The Lee Atwater Story. ”

Continued>>>
http://www.counterpunch.org/reed10242008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC