Editorial: Did Bush ignore warnings? - Democratic Underground

4dsc

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:50 AM
Original message

Editorial: Did Bush ignore warnings?

http://desmoinesregister.com/opinion/stories/c2125555/23869746.html

The best way for him to refute the charges is to cooperate with the 9/11 investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

smartass

(223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message

1. It wasn't a priority amongst the neocons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

stilpist

(335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message

2. I love the last line.

It's not considered acceptable for the press to call former Governor Bush a liar. But they can say

"The foot-dragging makes the White House look as though it doesn't want the truth to come out."

Another good line that can be used is questioning why no one was fired for screwing up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.