Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Red Ink? Wall Street Paid Hefty Bonuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:41 PM
Original message
What Red Ink? Wall Street Paid Hefty Bonuses
By almost any measure, 2008 was a complete disaster for Wall Street — except, that is, when the bonuses arrived.

Despite crippling losses, multibillion-dollar bailouts and the passing of some of the most prominent names in the business, employees at financial companies in New York, the now-diminished world capital of capital, collected an estimated $18.4 billion in bonuses for the year.

That was the sixth-largest haul on record, according to a report released Wednesday by the New York State comptroller.

While the payouts paled next to the riches of recent years, Wall Street workers still took home about as much as they did in 2004, when the Dow Jones industrial average was flying above 10,000, on its way to a record high.

Some bankers took home millions last year even as their employers lost billions.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. bonuses
Maybe the banks are paying their executives according to their ability to get handouts from the feds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't this called "highway robbery" or some such? n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess 'pay for performance' only goes for people making under $100,000 per year.
These assholes failed in every respect - they failed their shareholders, their employees, and, most importantly, the American citizens who paid for their bad bets. Any person at the level of manager or above who played any part in the decision-making process to start making these incredibly risky loans and buying these stinking securities should be fired as of today and forfeit any and all assets they accumulated while reaping the benefits of their schemes.

Who in the hell pays bonuses when your company loses money? I know my company sure as hell won't. I should have gone into banking. Incompetence and stupidity are apparently no obstacle to spectacular wealth in that field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC