Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US may spend up to 2Trillion to bailout banks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:30 PM
Original message
US may spend up to 2Trillion to bailout banks
moe: http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_may_spend_up_to_two_trillion_dlr_01292009.html

The United States may spend up to two trillion dollars to bail out banks reeling from losses amid financial turmoil and a deepening recession, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

The US Congress this month agreed to release the second half of a 700 billion dollar financial bailout fund, most of which have so far been used to shore up ailing banks, but the report said lawmakers might be asked to approve even more money for the purpose.

Government officials have discussed spending another one to two trillion dollars to help restore banks to health, the Journal said, quoting people familiar with the matter.

Some of the remaining 350 billion dollars from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) fund has already been earmarked for other efforts, including aid to auto makers and to homeowners facing foreclosure, the report said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
In the wake of all this bailing out, I don't recall ever reading or hearing a valid reason for doing so, other than to help the investor class. Have I missed something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. i have same question-WHY?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. nationalize the banks until the crisis is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yes, Gov takeover the banks-take the keys AWAY fr banks
now for a period TBD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. According to Bloomberg news in a December article
the Fed has already spent that money. They probably just want to be reimbursed. Bloomberg was unable to get info from the Fed under FOIA to explain how they had spent the $1.2T they already used for bank rescue. Bush's Justice Dept said the Fed didn't have to comply. Sorry I no longer have the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. We could BUY the banks for a lot less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, but then the people running the banks wouldn't get their bonuses and stuff.
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 05:40 PM by RC
How could you be so cruel?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If I could get paid one bonus such as these guys get every year, I could retire and not worry about money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I question just about anything the WSJ says, you just have to
but I'd sure like to know how they calculate that?

I would also be much more comfortable with the government buying and then refinancing bad mortgages (like we thought wss suppoed to be part of TARP before they changed their minds and decided to just give the banks a blank check). At least there would then be some real assets tied to the funds and the government (taxpayers) would have some chance to recover it's investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC