Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Klein: Bobby Jindal's Blustery Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:41 AM
Original message
Joe Klein: Bobby Jindal's Blustery Day
http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/02/22/bobby-jindals-blustery-day/

Bobby Jindal's Blustery Day
Posted by Joe Klein



Bobby Jindal is a very smart fellow. Back when he was in Congress, I'd try to check in with him every six months or so, just to see what he was thinking about. At first, we talked about health insurance--his specialty. Then, about the federal response to Hurricane Katrina (he was appalled). He was fairly relentlessly conservative, but sometimes quite creative and always intellectually honest.

In short, a different fellow from the one who appeared on Meet the Press today. This Jindal was relentlessly conservative, but not so intellectually honest. The Governor of Louisiana has made headlines this week by threatening to refuse the stimulus package funds headed to his state. But he's not going to do that, really. He's going to accept all the money heading his way--except for the funds associated with one program, a permanent change in the rules governing the provision of unemployment insurance to part-time workers.

He spent an awful lot of time griping about the overall stimulus package--although, in the end, that was pretty much a distortion, too. When it came down to it, Jindal didn't like the aforementioned unemployment insurance provision and the slight trims on tax breaks for small businesses. He also didn't like some of the infrastructure spending--on high-speed rail. He also didn't like $50 million orginially proposed for the National Endowment of the Arts. (I'm not even sure that famous $50 million made it into the final bill, although I hope it did: a country whose children have a more supple knowledge of music and art will, without question, have more sophisticated and productive workers.)

To summarize: Jindal opposes the unemployment codicil, the slimmer tax breaks for small businesses, the support for high-speed rail and the money for the arts. That leaves the overwhelming bulk of the stimulus package, which he presemably supports. A fair question would have been: Governor Jindal, if you were given a take it or leave it choice on the entire package headed for your state, would you take it or leave it? The answer, of course: he'd take it. And so would nearly every one of the Republicans who hooted and howled and grandstanded against the bill. They had the luxury of voting against it because they knew it would pass. I'd venture to say not a single Democrat who voted for the bill was 100% pleased with it. Many probably had objections as substantive, and ultimately as peripheral, as Jindal's. But they voted for the bill because they are now the majority party and it would have been irresponsible, given the economic free-fall, not to do so.

At one point in the interview, Jindal--who seems to be running for President--trotted out the standard Republican boilerplate about the need for a package with more tax cuts, especially in the capital gains tax. David Gregory pointed out that we'd just had eight years of that philosophy, and it hadn't done very much to help job creation or median incomes. Jindal resorted to the Republican fantasy playbook--to the Kennedy and Reagan tax cuts, which allegedly helped boost the economy. (Actually, it was the Carter-Volcker monetary reforms that set the economy on a more stable path for growth in the early 1980s.) Needless to say, Jindal didn't mention either the Reagan tax increases (proportionately the largest in U.S. history) or the slightly smaller Clinton increases, which led to the lowering of interest rates and the economic boom of the 1990's. Nor did he mention the 30 years of neglect the nation's infrastructure has suffered during the Reagan era--not just the neglect of roads and bridges and levees, but also of the sorts of high-tech and green infrastructure programs (including mass transit and high-speed rail) that will lay the basis for a more efficient economy in the future.

In other words, Jindal--the alleged voice of the GOP future--had absolutely nothing new to say. And what he did say, about the stimulus, was purposefully misleading. I'm not sure how well the Obama stimulus, banking and budget plans will work. No one does. But I do know how the philosophy and the misleading politics that Jindal offered today has worked in the recent past.

It's been a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's what Obama needs to tell these Governors - either you take the money or you don't
none of this bullshit "But I don't want to take this tiny little sliver only because I want to prove to everyone I'm a republican" bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I appreciate your posts. When I see your name I always translate it
to "baby lion sister" I don't know why. Anyway, Jindal is playing political games with a State that is still in crisis. These Governors need to be preparing to use this $ in the best possible ways for their people...not huffing and puffing and wasting precious time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sometimes I think Republicans are just plain mean-ass people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tooeyeten Donating Member (441 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. hard wired and hard hearted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
falcon97 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. I find myself in the awkward position of
agreeing with Joe Klein too much in the last 12 months or so. It's an air-tight destruction of the GOP govs' meaningless objections. I'm just wondering why they are getting so much air time. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tooeyeten Donating Member (441 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Good question
Playing to their base? The majority of viewers may be more Republican than Democratic, especially watching the economic downturn, many more retirees more conservative. Just guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope Jindal runs for president in 2012.
I don't think he has a chance of winning but Palin would be a waste of time and money. Obama will eat up Jindal in any debate and it will make Obama look better. Remember how Obama's debates with Clinton made him stronger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I dare Piyush Jindal to call Barack Obama "Hussein".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Notice how everyone starts stories about Jindal by claiming he's smart?
Jindal is a snake oil and used car salesman rolled into one. He might be clever, but he has not shown himself to be smart. He'll get as far as Rudy 911 did in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tooeyeten Donating Member (441 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. if he was such an expert on health insurance
what did he do about it while in Congress? He's not an expert, as much as he knows how to cut government programs, such as Medicaid, for those in dire need.

From his wiki, ....In 1996 Foster appointed Jindal to be secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, an agency which then represented about 40 percent of the state budget. During his tenure as secretary, Louisiana's Medicaid program went from bankruptcy with a $400 million deficit into three years of surpluses totaling $220 million. Jindal was criticized during the 2007 campaign by the Louisiana AFL-CIO for having closed some local clinics to balance the budget....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Jindal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC