Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solvent Insurer / Insolvent Insurer (Why are taxpayers paying off AIG's Hedge Fund?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 11:58 AM
Original message
Solvent Insurer / Insolvent Insurer (Why are taxpayers paying off AIG's Hedge Fund?)
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 11:59 AM by KoKo
Solvent Insurer / Insolvent Insurer
Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 4th, 2009, 7:30AM

Forget the good bank/bad bank, I have an even bigger beef with this INSANE absurdity: Why are the taxpayers making good on hedge fund trades gone bad?

I cannot figure that one out.

When AIG first faltered, there were two companies jammed under one roof. One was a highly regulated, state supervised, life insurance company. In fact, the biggest such firm in the world.

The other firm was an unregulated structured finance firm, specializing in credit default swaps and other derivatives.

The first firm was Triple AAA rated. They had a long history of steady growth, profitability, excellent management. They made money (as the commercial goes) the old fashioned way: They earned it.

This half of the company held the most important insurance in many families’ financial lives: Their life insurance. When an AIG policy holder passed away, the company paid off the policy, providing monies that get used to pay off mortgages, kids’ colleges, and surviving spouse’s life time living expenses. Given the importance of this payment, one can see why it is crucial to make sure there are sufficient reserves to make good on the promise of the life insurance policies. The actuarial tables used are conservative, the accounting transparent. The policy payoffs rock solid, utterly reliable.

AIG, this insurance company, was well run. It made a steady income, provided a valuable service to its clients.

It was also very solvent.

The other part of the firm was none of the above. It was neither regulated nor transparent. It existed only in the shadow banking world, a nether region of speculation, and of big derivative bets. This part of the company engaged in the most speculative of trading with hedge funds, banks, rank speculators, gamblers from around the world. Huge derivative bets were placed, with billions of dollars riding on the outcome. It served a far more limited societal function than the Life insurance portion, other than a legal pursuit of profit.

This part of AIG was nothing more than a giant structured finance hedge fund. Despite the fact this hedge fund had no rating, no supervision or oversight, it managed to trade off of the Triple AAA rating of the regulated half of the firm. Somehow, it was treated as if it was Triple AAA, regulated and guaranteed by the government.

This was nothing more than a giant scam, perpetrated by the people who were running the AIG hedge fund.

It was exempt from any form of regulation or supervision, thanks to the Commodities Futures Modernization Act. This ruinous piece of legislation was sponsored by former Senator Phil Gramm (R), supported by Alan Greenspan (R), former Treasury Secretary (and Citibank board member) Robert Rubin (D), and current presidential advisor Larry Summers (D). It was signed into law by President Clinton (D). It was the single most disastrous piece of bipartisan legislation ever signed into law.

As you might have guessed by now, this portion of AIG is the INSOLVENT half.

Here is the question that every single taxpayer should be asking themselves: WHY AM I PAYING $1000 TO BAIL OUT THIS GIANT HEDGE FUND?

Of all the many horrific decisions that Hank Paulson made, this may be his very worst. That is a very special description, given his track record of incompetence and cluelessness.

More...on what Ridholtz says should have been done at......
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/solvent-insurer-insolvent-insurer/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Expect that We Will Find Out This Week
now that the you-know-what finally hit the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because a Saudi Prince owns 85% of AIG
need any further explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you know which one? I suppose the name doesn't matter.
But the question can be re-framed. Why are we paying off this hedge fund owned by a Saudi Prince?

Would it not be a hoot, if this was Bin Laden's best friend?

"Bin Laden was born in Saudi Arabia around 1957 to a father of Yemeni origins and a Syrian mother. His father, Mohammed bin Laden, founded a construction company and with royal patronage became a billionaire. The company's connections won it such important commissions as rebuilding mosques in the holy cities of Mecca and Medina." http://www.infoplease.com/spot/osamabinladen.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Never forget, this Alan Greenspan who holds so much responisbility
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 04:25 PM by truedelphi
For the "Bad" that has descended upon our way of life, was cited by hillary Clinton as the person she wanted on her financial adviser team. Sen Clinton was saying that Greenspan could help us see our way out of the subprime mess!

So I voted for Obama, sure that he would not fall under the sway of Wall Street Weasels. Certainly he would turn to Issa, Maxine Waters, Clemmons, or Kucinch for advice on what to do about entities like AIG.

My bad, too! For Obama was no sooner elected than he was saying "Good Job there, Hank!" (meaning Paulson) and appointing Geithner, Summers, Rubin and Gensler to positions inside his administration that such nefarious liars should never have been able to touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC