Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Push to Legalize polygamy in utah?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 07:48 AM
Original message
Push to Legalize polygamy in utah?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7953270.stm

is this really going on?
I mean I know Polygamy is going on, but to actually main stream it?

I'm not completely against polygamy, it has recently become apparent that it is possible to love completely more than one person at a time, and to want to cover them in the legal aegis of marriage.

But I always figured it was just one of those things you can never do anything about.

It's also one of those things I would N O T recommend for even the above average person.

Thing is, I think that some of these things hold up partially because the idea of love is a little fleeting... I dunno.

All I know is that most compounds are not a terribly healthy environment to raise girls or even boys in, and end up being rather sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. The thing is,
not all polyamory is the stuff of polygamist compounds. Plenty of people have more than one partner, and everybody involved knows about it. While I don't support these compounds, I definitely cannnot support a law that makes people criminals simply for who they consensually sleep with. If people are guilty of rape, child abuse, or domestic violence, charge them with that, not polygamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right and that is exactly my point
The compounds are quite disturbing, but the idea that you can or want to be with more than one person, AS ADULTS, is less of an athima to me as it once was.
BUT....
I also think before we can have multiple people tied together, we need to make sure anyone of appropriate, legal age can marry, two men, two women, a man and a woman... no exceptions.

If two people want to live together under this legal aegis, it should be open to all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. So much for the one man one woman marriage crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, equal justice. If they legalize polygamy, they in turn must legalize polyandry.
We can DREAM some, can't we?!? :blush:

"Hubbies!?! Turn-in all your paychecks to my private (male) secretary." :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Doesn't polygamy include both polyandry and polygyny? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. No, I believe that polygamy = 1 man + > one woman; and polyandry = 1 woman + >1 man.
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 08:43 AM by ShortnFiery
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. polygyny = 1 man + >1 woman and polygamy = 1 spouse + > one spouse. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. OK, how 'bout I like the discernment? As they say men = woman = in ALL textbooks? Not quite.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thanks but I'll take definitions in dictionaries over textbooks. Have a good day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm so thankful that there are no know-it-all grammarians in my immediate family.
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 09:42 AM by ShortnFiery
U hav a gud dey two teech! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You never know, your grandma might be a grammarian! My feeble attempt at a pun. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Droll. I appreciate the information conveyed. I'm embarrassed that all these years I assumed wrong
information ... never thought to check it. Thanks again, even if you embarrassed me a little, you're alright by me. :-) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is kind of ironic
it is a branch of christian religion pushing for polygamy. It was probably christianity which outlawed polygamy for everybody in this country in the first place.

If people want to marry other consenting adults, let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Divorce will be a bitch and 3 quarters tho
It just occurred to me, that who are you divorcing?
hubby 1, wife 2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. It will be the savior of our country.
Lawyers will have lots of new business instead of searching for somebody to sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL yeah the one thing you can't really outsource =\ (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. The very nature of Polygamy turns women into property.
Oh, it sounds so good, let consenting adults marry whomever they want. I don't have a problem with my gay and lesbian sisters and brothers marrying. But Polygamy is a totally different issue.

There has never been a nation that allowed polygamy that didn't also treat women as chattel. I don't understand the social reasons, but I have seen the results. Maybe it's because when you have more than one of something it loses it's value. Maybe because old rich men accumulate thousands of wives while young (and usually poor) men end up with NO wives. Every large society that allowed polygamy has become a nation of misogynist and treated women as sub-human.

Until we can understand the causes and reasons for this. I would avoid polygamy like the plague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree, and really there's a snowball's chance in Florida of this happening
This is all just academic.
IF Utah did this, they would probably be kicked out of the union, or more likely over turned on those exact points - women as cattle.

In my personal life, i'd use it to protect someone I care about, who needs freedom from her situation, since she's too old for my wife n I to adopt her :)

Also how would you structure it? I mean legally, who is married to who? If I married another man (not impossible, I can think of at least one guy atm ;) ) would I have a husband and a wife, and does my wife have two husbands now? Does my husband have a husband and a wife, or just me, and I happen to also have a wife?

The thing about poly, legally, is it gets REALLY sticky REALLY fast.

While it is a nice idea sometimes, it's not a practical one.

And where do you draw the line?

2 mates? 3, 4, 1000?

At what point is it just impossible to keep adding mates?

And at what point is all this unfair to the other mates?

IF poly were ever allowed, then it should be 5 kinds of hell to get. This is not the sort of thing that should be willy-nilly available to anyone.

But I'm sure the divorce attorney community would love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. But it can happen under monogamy too
and people don't even have to be legally married in order to believe that their partner somehow "belongs to" them.

Also, women can be just as "worthless" under monogamous countries as they can under polygamous ones.

The US has been a monogamous country since its birth. How long did it take before women were allowed to vote? How many women are still...in the 21st Century, getting paid less than a man for doing equal work? How many men (and women) are out there trying to pass laws that take away a woman's Right To Choose? Women are still, to some extent, seen as second class citizens, right here in our own backyards.

I don't think we should bash polygamy for being a cause of various social ills.


In any case...and I say this only partially tongue-in-cheek...seems to me that men with many wives should know that they had better treat them with some sort of kindness lest those wives get together and beat the holy living shit out of the guy for being an asshole. Strength in numbers, you know...

;)



PS...I'm not defending polygamy, and I don't know if I'm really against it, either. Personally, I don't care what other consenting adults do with themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC