Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Not Bank CEOs? (David Sirota)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 08:45 PM
Original message
Why Not Bank CEOs? (David Sirota)
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 08:56 PM by chill_wind
Not a defense of Rick Wagoner, but rather a good question about a whole lot of Bank CEO's.



Why Not Bank CEOs?
by: David Sirota
Sun Mar 29, 2009 at 19:17

The Associated Press reports that "General Motors Corp. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner will step down immediately at the request of the White House, U.S. administration officials said Sunday." I'm not sure that's a good or bad thing, but I am curious about why the White House would make such a bold demand of a car company the federal government is lending to, but not a similar demand of the banks the federal government partially owns?

What I mean is - how is it that the White House is requesting the resignation of GM's CEO while not doing the same of, say, Bank of America's CEO? In fact, not only is the president not demanding the resignation of bank CEOs, he's actually hosting them for photo ops at the White House. Sure, I know some bank CEOs resigned a few months ago under shareholder pressure, but the Obama administration has never publicly demanded such resignations of the current management that is making the problems worse, nor the resignation of management at the biggest firms (Goldman Sachs, BofA, etc.) that are still in place.



the rest: http://www.openleft.com/

(link edit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think we all know the answer to that question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_jenne Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not enough room in the Treasury Department for them all?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merkins Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Thats Entertainment! Thanks for the laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Citi Bank should have dumped its CEO long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's not how it works. Citi CE *joins* Geithner (March 2009)
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 09:50 PM by chill_wind
Citi Chief Economist

(..)

The Wall Street Journal quoted an internal Citigroup memo saying that Alexander would leave his job in Citi to work on domestic financial issues at the Treasury, which is facing staff shortage.

Lewis Alexander, who has been at Citigroup since 1999 and before that worked at the Federal Reserve, will head to the Treasury "to work on domestic financial issues", the memo stated.

Further, the WSJ report cited a government official as saying that Alexander would be a counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

(..)

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/citi-chief-economist-quits-to-join-us-treasury-report/56858/on

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/18/citis-chief-economist-to-join-treasury-dept/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This will assure that there are minimal prosecutions
when all of this is over. There will be too many conflicts of interest. Dang!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, why not bankers?
Been asking right along...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is everything over? No one can get fired now, because.....?
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 03:08 PM by FrenchieCat
Obama first met with Wagoner on March 12th.


Obama first met with Bank CEOs on March 27th.


Or was the President supposed to call for resignation all at once?

The actions that President Obama is taking are not based on tit for tat.

This Blog post doesn't even take into consideration which CEO caused the problems,
versus which were brought in to clean up the mess.

In other words, this comment is devoid of substance and was designed
to attempt to make folks outraged.

Considering how badly our economy is doing, this instigative type of opining
is deconstructive, and does not serve anybody well as it is uninformed, and juvenile in its approach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. David Sirota doesn't sugarcoat his points & observations. Never has.
Never did it under Bush years, either. Feel free to scratch him off your reading list for the next four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. That is what the American public will want to know as well
Why not the bankers? In fact, we were told the bankers had to be given bonuses to retain their vast skills. But labor needs to make more concessions. Bankers get billions, labor gets bled dry.
Why not the bank CEOs indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yeah, but will we have any money left by the time we find out? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes, why not?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Obama's answer more out sourcing and H-1B visas.
He is of the opinion that the jobs that have been out sourced were crummy jobs that nobody wants to do. He is in favor of more visas to replace American workers who have been laid off.

All of his advisor's on how to fix the economy are the very ones who are responsible for destroying it. No problem replacing all those out sourced jobs, we are all going to be building solar panels that nobody can afford to buy. By the way, he might not have heard, but that hot green industry is laying off people. GE may even close it plant.

We have to keep the health insurances companies in business making outrageous profits so we can't have a real solution in single payer health insurance. We are going to develop a massive data bank operated by Chinese to determine if the health care that your physician in India has prescribed is cost effective.

The answer to the automobile problem is to cut the pay of the union workers. Its all their fault. The auto industry can't have any more money since we have to pay the bonuses to the Wall Street robber barons who destroyed the economy or they will quit.

Sorry, but I am getting to be a bit disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Could it be
GM refused to drop the Hummer? It's the tangible symbol of corporate stupidity the average person can understand. The machinations of banks and their executives just cause the average person to tune out.
It's not like there's a picture of them with their hands in the cookie jar.
The Hummer on the other hand, just makes average people wonder why anyone would make something for which there is a very limited market.
When GM and the others make a car that is reliable, affordable and cheap to operate they'll get back their market share. The need for vehicles that run on affordable energy without a huge carbon footprint is here now. When that need is addressed on the principle of people over profits everyone comes out a winner. It's just that people on the top of the food chain are so accustomed to stealing that it's become the norm for them. How many among us would be underpaid at a million a year?
The class warfare they've been winning for the past several years has reached the point of diminishing returns. The sooner the elites understand this the less likely the need for guillotines and head baskets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC