Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Watchdog Digs Into Conduct At SEC.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 11:34 PM
Original message
Watchdog Digs Into Conduct At SEC.
A Securities and Exchange Commission official attempted "to intimidate and influence" a family member's broker on multiple occasions by invoking her position, potentially violating agency rules, according to the agency's inspector general.

The allegation, detailed in a report reviewed by The Washington Post, is one of several that have raised questions about the internal conduct of some SEC employees at a time when the regulator is trying to counter accusations that it failed to effectively police Wall Street.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/16/AR2009051602359.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the SEC was supposed to be a "watchdog"?
Isn't that supposed to be the SEC's function? Who will watch the watchers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The SEC is
'an independent agency of the United States government which holds primary responsibility for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry, the nation's stock and options exchanges, and other electronic securities markets. The SEC was created by section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (now codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78d and commonly referred to as the 1934 Act). In addition to the 1934 Act that created it, the SEC enforces the Securities Act of 1933, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other statutes. . .

The SEC was established by the United States Congress in 1934 as an independent, non-partisan, quasi-judicial regulatory agency during the Great Depression that followed the Crash of 1929. The main reason for the creation of the SEC was to regulate the stock market and prevent corporate abuses relating to the offering and sale of securities and corporate reporting. The SEC was given the power to license and regulate stock exchanges, the companies whose securities traded on them, and the brokers and dealers who conducted the trading.

Currently, the SEC is responsible for administering seven major laws that govern the securities industry.'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That sounds like a watchdog to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Obviously when an SEC officer uses her position to intimidate.....
Edited on Sun May-17-09 10:29 PM by ThirdWorldJohn
her mother's broker and informs the broker's superior of her ire in an attempt to get the broker fired - is a violation of the rules at the SEC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not the "rule of law", is it?
But who let things get to be this way? There is no point in having fake "watchdogs", unless you want to cheat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seems like this agency has been corrupted through and through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't think so,
but am surprised to hear about these recent dumb things. If I were speaking to my husband, I might be able to learn something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC