Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Ed: responses to questions were distressingly rambling and unfocused

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:21 PM
Original message
NYT Ed: responses to questions were distressingly rambling and unfocused
The New York Times
April 14, 2004
Mr. Bush's Press Conference

Happily, President Bush finally held a prime-time news conference last night. Unhappily, he failed to address either of the questions uppermost in Americans' minds: how to move Iraq from its current chaos, and what he has learned from the 9/11 investigations.

Mr. Bush was grave and impressive while reading his opening remarks, which focused on the horrors of terrorism and the great good that could come from establishing a free and democratic Iraq. No one in the country could disagree with either thought. But his responses to questions were distressingly rambling and unfocused. He promised that Iraq would move from the violence and disarray of today to full democracy by the end of 2005, but the description of how to get there was mainly a list of dates when good things are supposed to happen.

(snip)

The second issue that has overwhelmed the nation in recent days is the 9/11 investigating commission. While repeatedly expressing his grief over the deaths related to the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, Mr. Bush seemed to entertain no doubts about the rightness of his own behavior, no questions about whether he should have done something in response to the domestic terrorism report he received on Aug. 6, 2001.

The United States has experienced so many crises since Mr. Bush took office that it sometimes feels as if the nation has embarked on one very long and painful learning curve in which every accepted truism becomes a doubt, every expectation a question mark. Only Mr. Bush somehow seems to have avoided any doubt, any change.

Here: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/14/opinion/14WED1.html?pagewanted=print&position=


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. about time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same paragraph really hit me too
The United States has experienced so many crises since Mr. Bush took office that it sometimes feels as if the nation has embarked on one very long and painful learning curve in which every accepted truism becomes a doubt, every expectation a question mark. Only Mr. Bush somehow seems to have avoided any doubt, any change.

= = =

Ow. I've never seen The Grey Lady apply a sledgehammer like this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. How long before Duhbya's sanity is openly questioned?
How could this have happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush has damaged his relationship with the press, it is beginning to show
THANK GAWD.

The whole rude SIR thing was EFFED UP!
The lying
The FAUX thing
The daily press briefings...

If he loses the media...he has lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's always been rambling and unfocused
...as he was throughout the 2000 campaign. The press chose to ignore the addled brained daffy prince's organic brain syndrome resulting from years of poly-substance abuse. What's new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. The NYT knows Bush is a sinking ship and is switching to Kerry.
Since Kerry will follow the dictates of our Fortune 500 oligarchy in regard to Iraq and other matters, our elite media will gladly support him too.

If the Democratic voters had picked a more liberal candidate, we would be seeing nothing but raves for Bush's performance tonight.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Excellent points Ted
Couldn't agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That is why the Kuch poster is still in my yard
and why we need to keep tugging the party back to the left, a place the country desperately needs to rediscover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why is the Screw York TImes Editorial page disconnected from Page One?
Page one is STILL filled with articles that lie for the GOP and kiss the Chimp's ass.

THere's a strange disconnect with the Screw York Times editorial and the rest of the paper (except for Krugman!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC