Obama's pragmatism will backfire

President Barack Obama's very non-ideological pragmatism, which has received so much praise inside the Beltway and which has given him public support in his few months in office, will ultimately be the downfall of his presidency.

This approach and the free pass it generates from the media may indeed allow him to push through programmes that here and there make significant advances toward a more generous and caring society. But it guarantees that he will not be able to gain mass support for a coherent worldview that can form the basis for an alternative to "let the marketplace decide", which has been the guiding principle for American domestic politics, and "let our power shape the world", which has been our primary approach to foreign policy.

The non-ideological approach implicitly encourages us to believe in Obama himself – he will be our saviour, our refuge, our deliverer from the bad times of the Bush administration.

And indeed he may. I believe that we've never had a more brilliant, decent and spiritually grounded president. Yet by failing to educate people on a fundamentally different way of thinking, by eschewing articulation of the spiritual and ethical principles that ought to guide us as a society and showing how his programmes flow from those principles, Obama is disempowering those who will have to continue the fight when he is no longer president.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/may/29/barack-obama-politics-agenda

Thats quite a good way to put it. It is a common trait of the modern Democratic party. When it comes to any kind of task that requires education and nudging the population to the left, it seems they settle for ideologically empty, "pragmatic" approach. Sometimes I just wonder if that is a way to appease the people and continue to capitulate to big business

and he is undeniably intelligent. But will he use those talents for the public good? Early signs say NO WAY.

of whom Obama professes to admire he will grow in to the job.

Lincoln rose to the changing circumstances. Obama's opportunity to "come to the aid of our country," has http://talkingimpeachment.com/blog/Hall-of-Shame-Inductee----Barak-Obama.html">long since passed.

Barring reversal(s) that would be astonishing to the level of suspecting mental illness, he will not be a champion against, or even a remedy for, bushcheneyism.

--

come out to abolish slavery until the Civil War was half finished and even then only in the rebelling states, he did so because of political considerations. At one point in his life Lincoln thought the slaves should be shipped back Africa, he grew and expanded his wisdom and moral courage while in office.

Lincoln felt the country wasn't ready yet for abolition and his primary goal was preservation of the union even though the abolition of slavery would seem like a moral no-brainer today, just as I believe Cheney/Bush's impeachment for torture and war crimes will only become more apparent to the people with time.

President Obama has been in office for a little over four months, and he inherits probably to some degree by deliberate Republican design, a Thanksgiving Platter full of problems to keep him occupied.

I disagree or have serious reservations with some of his decisions but I'm willing to give him more time before I pass final judgment.

I also believe we're doing President Obama a favor when we keep his feet to the fire on his decisions and the critical issues, I believe in many respects this is more important to his service and ultimate legacy than unequivocal praise.

...or more importantly, supportable by any evidence.

In fact, http://www.gallup.com/poll/120761/Cheney-Pelosi-Poor-Ratings-Common.aspx">with cheney on a PR roll, Obama is allowing us to continue to slouch toward Gomorrah.

It's far more likely that his weakness/impotence will continue to breed denial, hopelessness, and comtempt.

--

Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic in hoping that Obama has some fire and steel that will be tapped at some given tipping point.

I also see Cheney's corporate media enabled P.R. extravaganza in trying to white wash his policies of promoting torture and war crimes as a threat to our democratic republic and long term peace. While I believe this is giving Cheney a bump in the polls, I also believe this will become a double edged sword against him.

I'm hoping and praying the American People as a whole will wise up to what Cheney; is and represents, not to mention his corporate media agents.

We must evolve as a society or there will be war like no other in history.

This evolution will require some hard and difficult decisions, Obama along with the nation will need to decide whether Cheney is leading the way or the President of the United States, currently I believe Cheney with the aid of a compliant corporate media is leading. However my gut feeling is that at some point Obama will come to the emotional realization that he is the President and that's when all hell will break loose, for the better.

While pragmatism is great for building, you need to articulate a passionate ideology and a clear vision to form a solid foundation or when the eventual, almost inevitable high tide of fear and hatred comes along, all that you've built will be washed away.

Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread CHIMO.

:-(

The "Conspiracy" about 9/11. I hate to hear him just close that door on 9/11. He can't do it if they are going to try detainees for 9/11. If done right the US will have to have proof. And they don't. 9/11 makes for a good movie but it's not reality. Come on President Obama show us more video's of the Pentagon attack. Then tell us it's all a conspiracy. Those video's belong to "We the People". And I want to see them.

He also takes the long view and is willing to be cautious
and circuitous to ensure lasting change.

A president needs to have some strong ideology to do works for the good of the people. If Obama is a total centrist compromiser, why didn't he say so? Then at least we would have known what we were getting. And maybe we would have chosen Clinton. If I had been aware, for example, that Obama was not for single payer or transparency or investigating torture or several other etcs. I would have been very loath to support him.