Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Conason: Why So Scared of a Public Plan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 07:05 AM
Original message
Joe Conason: Why So Scared of a Public Plan?
from Truthdig:



Why So Scared of a Public Plan?

Posted on Jun 11, 2009
By Joe Conason


Within the coming weeks, Americans will begin to consider critical issues concerning the future of health care for themselves and their children, including universal coverage, taxation of benefits, computerized records and the controlling of costs. But before the debate commences in Congress and the media, big insurance and pharmaceutical companies are lobbying frantically (and spending millions of dollars) to foreclose the possibility of the most promising aspect of health care reform: a public insurance option.

After decades of denigrating government—and worshiping corporations—the idea that a public program might work as well or better than a corporate provider may well sound counterintuitive to many Americans. How can government, which is so widely believed to do nothing well while wasting enormous sums, possibly be expected to outperform the highly efficient, supremely managed and profitably motivated corporate sector? Wouldn’t we be better off if we simply entrust the provision of health care to the insurance industry? How can we trust those Washington bureaucrats with our health?

Actually, many consumers have learned by now that those questions are misleading at best. They know, for instance, that trusting a health insurance company is likely to be an expensive mistake. They know, too, that corporate bureaucrats can be even more ruthless in denying help to a beleaguered individual or family than those who work in government.

Studies have repeatedly shown that patient satisfaction with Medicare, the quintessential public insurance plan, is considerably higher than with private insurers among comparable age groups. And consumers understand that the drive for profits often conflicts with patient care, leading them to the conclusion that insurance and pharmaceutical corporations are excessively powerful and socially irresponsible. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090610_why_so_scared_of_a_public_plan/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because the con artist insurance companies can no longer scam the system
and become billionaires.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Honest truth
The honest truth is that the right is scared to death that a public plan will be successful. Of course, that's for various values of successful for which they would not all agree. But they don't want to get a plan in place that will become the new "third rail". A public option, almost ANY public option could quickly become very popular, and not just with the insured, but with employers. Truth is that right now, today, alot of employers would be glad to pay the government for a medicare like plan at the rate it costs the government. There will be alot of grumbling from people on the fringe who don't qualify for all the assistance they would want, but currently don't have insurance. And folks will always complain about change in general if their companies force them to switch from their private plans to a public option.

The biggest "problem" and really for both sides of the aisle, is that because it will be popular, it will be difficult to manage in a political sense. Folks will quickly forget the days when insurance was expensive, when it was available at all. There will be political pressure to keep costs to the consumers down, but keep service very "high" resulting occasionally wasteful or inefficient service delivery. The temptation to separate the cost to the consumer from the actual costs of delivery will be intense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excuse my ignorance
..but is medicare considered "single payer"?

I am way behind on the health care debate, but if medicare is single payer then that type of plan does seem to make sense. The main objections I hear about medicare is from MDs who want greater reimbursement for certain procedures. What I don't hear is people being denied important procedures from medicare.

Again...I'm just starting to play in this sandbox so sorry for the ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, Medicare IS single-payer. But...
Edited on Thu Jun-11-09 02:13 PM by RufusTFirefly
... as Dr. Marcia Angell explains, it is harmed by a for-profit delivery system


Medicare is, after all, a government-financed singlepayer
program embedded within our private, market-based system. It’s by
far the most efficient part of our system, with overhead costs of less than 3
percent, and it covers virtually everyone over the age of 65, not just some of
them.
It also covers everyone for the full package of benefits, so it can’t be
tailored to avoid high-risk patients. But Medicare is not perfect, and was
weakened by the Bush administration, which was hostile to it. Out-ofpocket
costs are substantial and growing. Doctors’ fees are skewed to
reward highly paid specialists for doing as many expensive procedures as
possible. Furthermore, because Medicare pays for care in a market-based
entrepreneurial system, it experiences many of the same inflationary forces
as the private insurance system. If Medicare were extended to everyone, it
would have to be in the context of a nonprofit delivery system. Otherwise,
we would not realize the advantages of a single-payer, coordinated financing
system.



Please check out the video of Dr. Angell's testimony and be sure to rec the thread if you're so inclined so others will be able to view this powerful, crystal-clear argument for single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Taxes
Edited on Thu Jun-11-09 12:53 PM by Demeter
Fear of paying for the service. Fear of actually opening the change purse and shelling out for services rendered to the rich by every underpaid worker in this nation. Visualize Scrooge McDuck, with Donald's temper.

After all, Reagan said they could get it all for nothing. That was what the Contract on America WAS ALL ABOUT.

And now, the rich are realizing that the contract is null and void, a fraud, and THEY are the only ones with deep pockets to pay for the crime....after all, how can they maintain their standard of living if they have to pay tax at the same rate as a single mother eligible for food stamps by virtue of her minimum income and maximum tax bill? Why, they might even have net worth decline by 5%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess it's because people are afraid of losing individual greatness.
Should they accept a ho-hum everybody's the same health care, and, horrors, it works, so that it will stay, they fear they won't feel lucky to hit another jackpot of life.

They fear they might lose what little jackpot they have, probably from knowing someone rich, and clinging to saying things that don't offend their chances.

But, they are wrong, deluded, and would have the jackpot of jackpots if they felt for themselves instead of seeing themselves through the lying eyes of others caught in the same trap they cannot escape until they let go of the prize in the narrow necked bottle and just turn their lives upside down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. A public plan will not provide barrels of money to get Congresspersons elected.
And most of the present members of Congress do not know HOW to run a campaign that is not based on barrels of money. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Th insurance/pharmaceutical corps own our politicians because we cannot
or will not (put out the effort) pay for federal elections (which would save taxpayers billions, if not trillions in the long run and the short term.) The Congress (both parties) and the president are beholden to big pharma and insurance corporations due to donations. The lies about the public healthcare of all the other industrialized countries stem from both of the above. It is time for Americans to stand up for themselves on election reform and healthcare reform. It is our only avenue and hope. Obama is a disappointment; he does not support true change, only what will bring him accolades for falacious change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I want to believe the President
is playing a strategic game, trying to gather the center of the populace, to ensure a second term, with an overwhelming advantage in Congress, when great things can be accomplished.

So far, the Republicans seem to be accommodating.

I really, really want to believe this. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC