Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget about bipartisanship (Gene Lyons)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
mooseandsquirrel Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:28 PM
Original message
Forget about bipartisanship (Gene Lyons)
President Obama was elected with perhaps the best chance in a generation to reform America's unjust and grotesquely inefficient health care system.

To do so, however, he'll have to conquer not only entrenched special interests like the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and the American Medical Association, but his own sentimental rhetoric about bipartisanship.

snip

http://moose-and-squirrel.com/gene/gene.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bingo
This is not a game. It is not an olive branch moment.
This is about who lives and dies in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no bi-partisanship. It is an illusion, and a piss poor one at that.
It is entirely one sided. I think he needs to deal with the political reality of what the republican agenda really is. It damn sure isn't bipartisanship. I don't think it even makes the list of their priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. We won! We won! We won!
Why is there all this talk of bipartisanship with the GOP, who clearly didn't give a damn about Democratic ideas when they were in charge? They wouldn't let even one Democrat into the reconciliation meetings, which is where the law is really made. Why is it they only needed 51 votes to pass a bill in the Senate and we need 60? Did someone change the Constitution while I was out walking the dog?

Why are we even talking to them? All they want to do is "Norm Coleman" the medical reform movement -- delay as long as possible, then delay some more. For every minute we let them talk we are wasting one of ours. For every GOP "talking point" we respond to as if it had validity we lose ground because we're not putting forth our own ideas. They are trying to run out the clock.

Make them hold their make-believe "hearings" in the basement!

This is like the losing team insisting they be allowed to have their own float in the winners' victory parade -- and then letting them put it at the head of the parade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he is trying to avoid what happened to Clinton
when he had the majority in Congress and tried to "ram" things through and the subsequent loss of a majority in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Instead of bipartisanship with Fascist Pigs and Right-Wing Terrorists...
we should be locking them up or kicking them out of our country! This bunch has no place in American Society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC