Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attackerman: Vietnam is Back

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:05 AM
Original message
Attackerman: Vietnam is Back
Vietnam Is Back
By: Spencer Ackerman

Since the Helmand River Valley campaign began, I've grown increasingly worried that the mismatch between tactics, strategy and U.S. interests in Afghanistan was growing deeper. Is Michael Cohen right? Is the Obama administration's strategy drifting further into mission creep? After a conference call with Steve Biddle, one of the advisers to the McChrystal strategy review, I'm starting to agree.

McChrystal thinks Afghanistan isn't the point in Afghanistan -- stabilizing Pakistan is -- and so we should devote the next 12 to 24 months to making some imperfect-but-clear-enough improvements in population security in select provinces like Khost, Kandahar and Helmand in order to see that through. What? Biddle even said that the parallel between Afghanistan and Vietnam is a "very important analogy to keep in mind." And he favors staying. Much as I can see the argument that these things are complicated and rhetorical strategy isn't the same thing as actually winning an argument, when you see your own argument becoming, Well, this is kind of Vietnam-esque... that should really occasion a reconsideration of basic premises.

Then I read, via Michael, that commanders in McChrystal's orbit are talking about counterinsurgency pretty much at the expense of counterterrorism.

"Senior government officials said Bin Laden remained a prime target but that they needed to focus on fighting the Taliban."

"We might still be too focused on Bin Laden," the official said. "We should probably reassess our priorities."

<snip>

Perhaps I'm misreading what it is the people around McChrystal are saying, but it seems fair to say that the balance of evidence favors an interpretation that Afghanistan strategy is coming unmoored from the actual objectives of the war, and the actual interests at stake, and the White House is being either deluded or outright dishonest about what's happening. "Our goal is to deal with the terrorist elements that are in that country and are making life for Afghans and potentially life for millions throughout the world more dangerous through their activities," Robert Gibbs said from the White House podium today. That is simply not what's coming from McChrystal's circle.

<more>

http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/vietnam-is-back/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC