Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Ohio illegally limits lobbying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:39 PM
Original message
Judge: Ohio illegally limits lobbying
Crime & Courts Cincinnati.Com Crime & Courts

Last Updated: 12:51 pm | Tuesday, August 4, 2009

A federal judge Tuesday declared that Ohio’s law limiting lobbying activities violates the First Amendment rights of a former state legislator from Cincinnati.


The decision clears the way for former Ohio Rep. Tom Brinkman to become an unpaid lobbyist for a local anti-tax group and raises questions about whether the state law can withstand a broader constitutional challenge.


Ohio’s law, known as a “revolving door” statute, bars former state legislators from lobbying activities for at least one year after they leave office. The purpose of the law is to prevent vote buying and other unethical behavior by limiting the ability of legislators to profit from relationships with private groups and lobbyists.


But U.S. District Judge Susan Dlott ruled that the law appears to be too broad and infringes on Brinkman’s First Amendment right to speak out and lobby on behalf of causes or organizations. She granted a preliminary injunction that blocks enforcement of the law as applied to Brinkman and allows him to do free work for private groups, including the Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST), an anti-tax group he founded 10 years ago.

http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/AB/20090804/NEWS0107/307300069/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lobbying is not the problem, money is the problem.
Campaign contributions are bribes, elections should be run 100% on public funds. Money is not speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Someone needs to help the judge out
I was surprised she bought that "whine." x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not surprised.
Corruption happens, and Judges are often at the center of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC