Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama=Socialist Campaign Gives Socialism New Cachet (Charles Dews)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 11:35 AM
Original message
Obama=Socialist Campaign Gives Socialism New Cachet (Charles Dews)
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 12:03 PM by Tace

Charles Dews -- World News Trust

Aug. 17, 2009 -- I normally try to not watch such unmitigated tripe, but the other day I saw on some news show or the other—they all look nowadays like Entertainment Tonight—on which there was some unknown politician bravely and patiently listening to a horde of nutty people screaming at the tops of their voices and gesticulating fiercely in his quickly fading direction. The pols face was a shade of Washington, DC, gray, and the people were distinctly red, in the face, not politically, of course. Reds are not nearly so fierce these days. Red might not be exactly the right description—it might have been more like purple in the face.

In any case, the poor politician was mumbling incoherently about how Obama had all of our best interests at heart and how he would not raise taxes to pay for "universal" health care except on the very rich—I believe the figure $250,000 was mentioned. Not that $250,000 is rich by today´s standards, but it seemed like a good round number that above which taxation would heretofore be levied. I am for taxing anyone who makes a cent more than I do from my retirement check, which barely keeps my SKY bill paid and my Internet service winging my way effortlessly and wirelessly, to say nothing of affording me a modicum of good parmesan cheese for adorning my boiled semolina pasta or a bottle of Stolichnaya now and again to share with friends who like the semblance of a good martini a pitless green olive can make.

Watching those angry and, astonishingly ugly, faces on the tube made me realize something important, I think. Many of the humans lifting those faces camera-ward were also sporting cheap white T-shirts and shiny plastic buttons emblazoned with the absurd idea that President Obama, that scion of Harvard, writer of best-selling books, husband of the impeccable, irrepressible Michelle, is a socialist. I could almost smell the stressed cheap underarm deodorant.

As a socialist myself, and not the wishy-washy liberal, bourgeois, baloney, everything-is-gonna-get-better-if-only-we-could-vote-for-a-socialist variety either. I am a dyed in the wool Bolshevik, a revolutionary leftist, a Trot, a mounter of barricades, would-be thrower of Molotov cocktails at class traitors sort of socialist. We used to be called communists back in the good old days of the Sixties, but now that there are no communists left, we are left with the softer monicker—socialist. I don´t like it, but that´s the way it is.

more

http://worldnewstrust.com/commentary/3588-obamasocialist-campaign-gives-socialism-new-cache
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's spelled C A C H E T, pronounced ca-shay.
Cache is a collection of stored items, pronounced 'cash'.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the C-A-T-C-H
I fixed it in the headline, anyway. : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's cool - still suffering a little lingering resentment from early in the
Iraq was when the 'reporters' (who should know better) kept talking about finding a new 'ca-shay' of arms, and the military saying 'we heard there was an arms ca-shay in the area', yada yada.
Like fingernails on a blackboard. All because someone (I think it was Chimp, but could have been Rummie) said it first, and NOBODY WOULD CORRECT HIM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. too bad Barack looks out for the enemy
I cant see how convincing a majority of intelligent citizens that a single payer medical system, where the patient/client is given best possible representation in the healthcare marketplace when prices set for drugs and med treatment etc, is in any way difficult, especially when the President has the WHouse bully pulpit to explain the simple fact a single payer system doesn't preclude multiple providers-every doctor can be his own corporation, if he wants, but somehow the simple idea of a single payer, meaning the people/public/taxpayer EMPOWERED BY PROFESSIONAL wheeler dealer reps who negotiate the prices to be paid (paying too much, or unable to pay enough, is not the issue, since that's the system we use now) by them, as taxpayers...Obama seems to be junyer bush, but a better quality of gee bush (who 'sold' the Iraq war despite having only wooden nickles and fools gold etc to pay for it, and no wmd's to justify it!) but still we 'bought' it on the CREDIT CARD!

Obama should declare an end to the 'war on drugs' cuz it's clearly a fraud, and once the pigs are on the run, then jam through a single payer med system, but ...maybe obama isn't serious about change and serving his supporters- too much like algore and john kerry always looked out for mister pig's interests, as matter of fact (trying to pass a universal health care program fresh outta the gate seems to be foolish- and didn't liberal clinton also do that?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC