Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murdoch's Wall Street Journal Agrees With Obama, WTF?: "Obama Is Right About Fox News"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 04:40 AM
Original message
Murdoch's Wall Street Journal Agrees With Obama, WTF?: "Obama Is Right About Fox News"
At first I thought it was going to go into a long sarcastic screed, but it turns out that they are actually agreeing with President Obama. I can't understand how this managed to slip through the net...

Obama Is Right About Fox News

OCTOBER 28, 2009

Journalism has a special, hallowed place for stories of its practitioners' persecution. There is no higher claim to journalistic integrity than going to jail to protect a source. And the Newseum in Washington, D.C., establishes the profession's legitimacy with a memorial to fallen scribes, thus drawing an implicit connection between the murdered abolitionist editors of long ago and the struggling outfit that gave you this morning's page-one story about cute pets in Halloween costumes.

But no journalistic operation is better prepared to sing the tragedy of its own martyrdom than Fox News. To all the usual journalistic instincts it adds its grand narrative of Middle America's disrespectful treatment by the liberal elite. Persecution fantasy is Fox News's lifeblood; give it the faintest whiff of the real thing and look out for a gale-force hissy fit.

As the Obama administration has discovered by now. A few weeks ago, after Fox had scored a number of points against administration figures and policies, administration spokesmen decided it was time to start fighting back. Communications Director Anita Dunn called the network "a wing of the Republican Party," while Obama himself reportedly dismissed it for following "a talk radio format."

The network's moaners swung instantly into self-pitying action likening the administration's combative attitude to Richard Nixon's famous "enemies list."

=snip=

To point out that this network is different, that it is intensely politicized, that it inhabits an alternate reality defined by an imaginary conflict between noble heartland patriots and devious liberals—to be aware of these things is not the act of a scheming dictatorial personality. It is the obvious conclusion drawn by anybody with eyes and ears.

Full article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703574604574499671746743510.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The obvious conclusion drawn by anybody with eyes and ears
"To point out that this network is different, that it is intensely politicized,"

D'oh, fer sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's not like it's really a big secret.
A few minutes spent watching Faux's spin proves they aren't news. It's propaganda with a distinct right wing emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Faux on Faux?
Wondering how this slipped through Rupert's propagandists.... more likely its a deliberate ploy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is curious
The only thing I can make of it is that the WSJ editorial board is desperate to be a major force in conservative journalism and they want to disassociate themselves from the clowns at FAUX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Looky! Murdoch has made the WSJ fair & balanced too!
That's what I'd expect wingnuts to say if this op-ed piece is mentioned to them. I recall previous instances where sanity & truth has found its way into OpinionJournal, but they were always few & far between. Perhaps it's just a tradition carried over from those days before Sir Ruprecht Morlock took possession of the WSJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Perhaps Rupe wants Ailes out
So he can put one of his own family in charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC