Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gene Lyons thinks Obama's Afghanistan plan is a long shot.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
mooseandsquirrel Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:29 AM
Original message
Gene Lyons thinks Obama's Afghanistan plan is a long shot.
LITTLE ROCK — So our cerebral president has decided that the way out of Afghanistan is to plunge in farther.

http://moose-and-squirrel.com/gene/gene.html

Happy Holidays
m&s

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it's a long shot but it's better than no decision at all.
Unlike Bush, Obama will correct his course as time goes by. That is how you get from here to there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Better a long shot with an uncertain outcome, than a rapid pullout
with a very predictable outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. why is it better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because the very predictable outcome is a radical islamic state
with nuclear neighbors on three borders - border which they are all to happy to ignore.

This is our last, best chance of stabilizing the region. It may work, or it may not. But if we were to just declare victory and go, as we did with Vietnam, the chaos that follows would make Cambodia's killing fields look like a fistfight in the parking lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. then I guess we're never leaving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's more of a stall, stalling dealing with failure.
Edited on Fri Dec-11-09 10:37 AM by bemildred
The US government hates dealing with failure, and it is used to being able to stall and double-down indefinitely.

Calling it a "long shot" is mindless, baseless optimism, we have been there 8 years, spent billions of dollars, and accomplished nothing whatsoever but transient distortions in the economics and politics of the place. There is no past history of US "success" in these sorts of things either to suggest that this might be some sort of fluke, unless you think Grenada was a "success". The last time we had a real success in this sort of thing was WWII, maybe you could argue for S. Korea too. On the other hand the sort of failure one sees in Afghanistan is very like a long list of US invasions of foreign territories stretching back into the early history of the country, Vietnam in particular in recent history. All we need is seven more years and this war will have been just as long as that one, and the very length of time that this has gone on is the best possible evidence that we are bogged down and either incompetent or helpless to do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC