Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fooled ya again!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:14 PM
Original message
Fooled ya again!
"I will vote against any plan that doesn't include a public option."

You read that here in an Oct. 9 commentary piece for the Tribune by U.S. Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill. He insisted that a government-run insurance plan was the key to affordable, accessible, quality health care. "A public option must be a central component of any health insurance reform legislation," he wrote.

A couple of weeks later, he said on C-SPAN: "I have stated it, unequivocally, that if the final package does not carry with it the strong public option that would allow individuals to have competition ... then I would not vote for that legislation."

He even threatened to conduct his own filibuster.

The darn thing is, some people took him at his word. For a while there, a few Democrats thought Burris just might be the savior of government-run health insurance.

After all, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid needed every Democratic vote, and Burris said he wouldn't vote...

Gotcha!

Burris voted, along with every other Democrat in the Senate, for a bill that doesn't include even a whiff of the public option.

And for those who may have though that "unequivocally" meant "unequivocally"?

"We don't want to get caught up in language," he told the Associated Press.

more:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/chi-1229edit1dec29,0,7237966.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. "final package" do you comprehend those two words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can I hold you to that when he votes for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hold watever you want, but that is what he said.
Do I think he has the balls to hold out? doubt it. Hope so, but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't he say "any plan" on Oct 9th?
Was the Senate bill a plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Except this paragraph seems like a total repudiation of his earlier quote in regards
to his steadfast commitment to only support a bill with a public option.



<snip>

"What he meant to say, Burris later explained, was that he wouldn't support a bill unless he believed it would control health care costs, promote competition among insurance companies and hold providers accountable. Oh."

<snip>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Last night I was watching a PBS show I tivo'ed on Oct. 26th.
It was an "American Experience" show on the 1929 stock market crash.

At the end of the show, it was still recording the PBS news headlines and stories from the day.

"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said today that any bill coming out of the Senate WILL HAVE A STRONG PUBLIC OPTION".

Just shook my head. And went to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. alot of head shaking these last 10 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. "There's no public option in that bill, and it's a good thing."
"There's no public option in that bill, and it's a good thing."

WTF??? That's a line from the Chicago Tribune's editorial. Are they pushing the GOP agenda, or what??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The Tribune and the GOP
birds of a feather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks to modern advertising and PR, you CAN now fool all of the people all of the time.
Who would have guessed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC