Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"What Massachusetts Got Right" by Robert Scheer on The Nation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:46 PM
Original message
"What Massachusetts Got Right" by Robert Scheer on The Nation
The president got creamed in Massachusetts. No amount of blaming this disastrous outcome on the weaknesses of the local Democratic candidate or her Republican opponent's strengths can gainsay that fact. Obama's opportunistic search for win-win solutions to our healthcare concerns and our larger economic problems is leading to a lose-lose outcome for the president and the country.

The two issues that mattered on election day were the economy, which Obama has sold out to Wall Street--as quite a few disgruntled voters pointed out--and his plea to save healthcare reform, which the voters who had backed him for the presidency with a huge majority now spurned. It is significant that it was the voters of Massachusetts who have now derailed the Democrats' efforts to revamp the country's healthcare system by denying them the necessary sixtieth vote in the Senate, for these voters know the subject well.

The federal proposal is based on their own state's model requiring people to obtain health insurance without the state doing anything to effectively control costs through an alternative to the private insurance corporations. Lacking a public option, the cost of healthcare in Massachusetts, already the highest in the nation at the time of the plan's implementation, has spiraled upward. Services have been curtailed, and many, particularly younger people, feel they are being forced to sacrifice to pay for a system that doesn't work.

Instead of blindly following the failed Massachusetts model, Obama should have insisted on an extension of the Medicare program to all who are willing to pay for it. He squandered the opportunity to bring about meaningful healthcare change that the public would have supported had it been kept simple and just. Instead, Obama gave away the store to medical profiteers. They, in turn, hopelessly muddied the waters with well-funded scare advertising tactics that principled leadership on Obama's part could have thwarted.

Read more: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100201/scheer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, Scheer is one of my favorite OpEd authors.
Of course we here at DU said the same back when we saw whom he was picking as his staffers and when Nancy Pelosi said he would govern from the center. We knew it back then. Now the proof is here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. The economy: anyone who thought giving hundreds of billion$ to Wall Street and big banks
and believed that the millions of struggling Americans would be happy with that choice is dumber than a bag of rocks and will be rewarded accordingly by the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I Rec'd this but it said i had already done so..I HAD NOT..so please count me as a K&R !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. So basically, Mass is a microcosm of what the entire country
would be like with the Senate bill. This helps explain why some people would want Brown to be GOP 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC