Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Double Standard For Bernanke: Only 50 Votes Needed In Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:38 PM
Original message
Double Standard For Bernanke: Only 50 Votes Needed In Senate
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 01:49 PM by yurbud
It's hard to escape the impression that Democrats only work the rules when they are taking care of the wealthy and Wall Street, but when it comes to things that help the working and middle class like real health care reform (not welfare for insurance companies), they feign ineptitude and timidity in the face of the scary GOP micro-minority.

I look forward to the DLC explanations for this.

One I can already guess--Bernanke MUST be reconfirmed to keep the market from panicking and dropping. I say, fuck that shit. Wall Street has functioned like a neutron bomb on our economy, killing people and jobs while leaving property standing so they can collect it without resistance. We cannot allow them to hold us hostage, and when they issue their threats through their surrogates in the government, they should be treated like any other terrorists.

When it comes to progressive priorities in the Senate, there's one standard: 60 votes are needed. But for Ben Bernanke, there's a second standard: 50 will be just fine, thank you.

Democratic leaders in the Senate are asking colleagues who are reluctant to support Bernanke's nomination for a second term as Federal Reserve chairman to nevertheless vote with them to end a filibuster and allow a vote on the actual nomination. The reluctant members would then be free to vote no to express their displeasure. Several Democrats have committed to just that and others are considering it.

The public health insurance option was stripped from health care reform because it didn't have 60 votes. An expansion of Medicare took its place but it, too, was dropped for having fewer than 60. Both proposals had at least 50 votes. Dawn Johnsen, a nominee to head the Office of Legal Counsel, has the backing of progressive organizations, but a 60-vote threshold has held her up for a year.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told reporters on Monday afternoon after a meeting with Bernanke that some opponents of the chairman had pledged to support him on the first vote, but not on the second.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/double-standard-for-berna_n_436971.html


vote up on social bookmarking sites so others see it:

http://buzzflash.net/story.php?id=1072041
http://www.jabberwonk.com/flinker.cfm?cliid=27kz2
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/auev5/double_standard_for_bernanke_only_50_votes_needed/?already_submitted=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a matter of priorities
you see. :shrug: Amazing what they can and can't do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there aren't 41 votes ...
against and an intent to filibuster filed with the Senate clerk, then there isn't a filibuster and it only takes 51 votes to confirm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So you don't think Harry Reid couldn't get some of the Blue Dogs let health care through and
express their displeasure in the final vote? There are no threats or inducements that could get them to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let Wall Street crash...we can rebuild...
Oh, and the banks, too. There's plenty of talent in this country to rebuild the economy once "the best and the brightest" are shown the door...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they should be shown the gallows or at least some tar and feathers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. 50 for Ben - but not enough for health care...wow, they don't
even try bother to give any bullcrap explanation to the sheeple anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC