Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the Top U.S. Companies Pay in Taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 04:24 PM
Original message
What the Top U.S. Companies Pay in Taxes

As you work on your taxes this month, here's something to raise your hackles: Some of the world's biggest, most profitable corporations enjoy a far lower tax rate than you do -- that is, if they pay taxes at all.

The most egregious example is General Electric (NYSE: GE - News). Last year the conglomerate generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.

Avoiding taxes is nothing new for General Electric. In 2008 its effective tax rate was 5.3%; in 2007 it was 15%. The marginal U.S. corporate rate is 35%.

How did this happen? It's complicated. GE's tax return is the largest the IRS deals with each year -- some 24,000 pages if printed out. Its annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission weighs in at more than 700 pages.

http://finance.yahoo.com/taxes/article/109244/what-the-top-us-companies-pay-in-taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some idiot repuke in my state
Edited on Sat Apr-03-10 04:41 PM by proud2BlibKansan
actually proposed eliminating taxes on corporations. As if they pay so much now?? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Conceptually it makes sense to eliminate corporate taxes except for an amount
that is commensurate with the costs they incur to society and to shift the burden directly to capital owners. Currently, the corporate income tax is actually an indirect tax on capital owners and some of the incidence actually gets spread to workers. So, if the corporate income tax was eliminated and there were higher taxes directly on capital owners, the system would be more direct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, there is a certain logic to support the idea
Then corporations could skip the expense of elaborate calculations by tax accountants before they make capital decisions. Or other financial decisions, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And didn't the gipper believe corporations should not pay income taxes, that income taxes were a
people tax that only people should pay? But now that corporations are people, shouldn't corporations be paying income taxes at the highest marginal rates and also be subject to the AMT and: for good measure, be eligible for the death penalty for conviction of certain egregious crimes, just like ordinary people can? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Since corporations are now people . . . .
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeviewonder Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And since they can marry (merge) like natural people
why is it that gays and lesbians are not allowed to marry? It just doesn't make any damn sense to me that they are legally people and are treated like they have the freedom to do as they please. If this doesn't make a case for protectionism I don't know what does. Seriously, if they are allowed to save so much in taxes by doing business abroad or simply parking assets there maybe we should tax them enough to make up the difference. It would probably stop them as well as clean up that loophole. Of course, this is just my thought and it's just a start to make the playing field a little more fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
propaper Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Many argue the less taxes corporations pay the less stuff they make costs.
I believe taxes are just a cost of doing business and ultimately that TV you buy is increased by the cost of any taxes the corporation ends up paying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I know I could charge a lot less for my carpentry work if I didn't have to pay taxes...
So if its OK with you, I'll just skip the taxes this year and reduce all my charges by say 20%...It will all even out in the end.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. conservatives love flat taxes--let's give them to transnational corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Woo hoo! Free market baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Simplify
The amount they report to shareholders should also be reported to the IRS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC