Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Would Nixon Do

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:18 PM
Original message
What Would Nixon Do

by Steven D
Wed Apr 7th, 2010 at 09:18:06 AM EST

Pretend with me for a moment that the following events, some of which have already occurred and some of which are scheduled to occur this April 19, 2010, might have occurred during the Nixon Administration in the early 70's. Then ask yourself this question: What Would Nixon Do?
Imagine for a moment it is 1970, not 2010. Imagine further (though as we know this never happened) a large group of radical protesters to the Nixon administration descended on a National Park just outside the District of Columbia, followed by a march on the Capitol. Imagine that these groups stated their intention to hold speeches and rallies to Restore the Constitution from the "tyranny" of the then current President, Richard M. Nixon.

Now imagine that the organizers of this group were encouraging every attendee to bring with them and openly carry their firearms as a signal to their government regarding the seriousness of their purpose. Imagine further that one of the main speakers at this event was to be the leader of a group of individuals dedicated to defying any order by the federal, state or local governments they consider, in their sole discretion, to be unconstitutional. Imagine further, that this rally was scheduled to be held days after the FBI raided and arrested members of a heavily armed anti-government group which had plans to kill and murder thousands of law enforcement officers in an attempt to spark a civil war and overthrow the government.

Now imagine that the date of this rally was the same day a domestic terrorist opposed to Nixon's policies and the policies of his administration, who was considered a hero to many of the individuals planning to attend these rallies, had killed over a hundred people, including children, and wounded hundreds more, by exploding a truck bomb outside a federal office building. Well Nixon is dead, so we can't ask him, but we do know what he did do to unarmed antiwar protesters in Washington in 1971. He called in 10,000 military reinforcements, canceled a permit the protesters had been granted to hold a rock concert in Washington Potomac Park and in the early morning of May 2, 1971 had police attack the sleeping protesters by knocking down their tents and firing with tear gas causing most of them to scatter and eventually leave Washington, Of those who stayed. some of whom participated in non-violent acts of civil disobedience such as shutting down streets and blocking intersections, the police conducted massive sweeps in which they arrested over 7000 people. Nixon also secretly told his staff that he supported the use of Teamster "thugs" to attack and beat up anti-war demonstrators.

Of course, this was not as horrific as the events of the May. 1970 Kent State and Jackson State massacres in which unarmed civilians had been gunned down by National Guard units at Kent State and by police at Jackson State.

Andn I suppose we don;t need to go as far back as the early 70's to get an idea of how Republican officials might respond to protesters. All we need to do is recall the mass arrests of thousands of New Yorkers and others during the 2004 Republican National Convention at which President Bush was re-nominated.

Continued>>>
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2010/4/7/84530/00988
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Commie sympathizers...all of them!
Then he would call out the national guard and break up the demonstration...forcefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. To Nixon, the protesting students at Kent State were the "terrorists" of his era.
He saw them as a threat to him and to the country and treated them like a military enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Non-violence whether from protestors or the government serves a purpose: it makes the other side
look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hoover would have had dossiers on all of them
FBI agents would have infiltrated and been in on the planning of the march. As forvthe guns, there were far fewer around and the laws were a lot more restrictive. A heavily armed group might have been seen as an insurrection and met with force majeur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johan helge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's called asymmetry
Edited on Thu Apr-08-10 01:11 PM by johan helge
Everyone who thinks that politics is a "symmetric" fight between equally good or equally strong forces, should read this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC