Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Hill: The Big Question: Should Obama reconsider offshore drilling? (May 3)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 08:58 AM
Original message
The Hill: The Big Question: Should Obama reconsider offshore drilling? (May 3)

The Big Question: Should Obama reconsider drilling?

By Sydelle Moore - 04/29/10 01:32 PM ET

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:

Should the Obama administration reconsider its offshore drilling plans because of the Gulf Coast oil spill?



Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen's Energy Program, said:

YES. This disaster - which claimed the lives of 11 workers in addition to threatening the Gulf coast with an ecoological armaggeden - underscores that the mantra of "drill baby drill" carries far more risks than rewards.

Offshore drilling puts workers and our environment at risk. BP alone has paid $485 million in fines and settlements to the U.S. government for environmental crimes, willful neglect of worker safety rules and penalties for manipulating energy markets.

Further, ending the moratorium on offshore oil drilling would have little impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030, according to the Energy Information Administration. That's because the U.S. isn't Saudi Arabia; we sit on only 1.6 percent of the world's oil reserves, while the Saudis have 20 percent. The oil we have can't make a significant dent on our imports or impact prices.

And opening new areas to drilling while failing to hold oil companies accountable for fleecing taxpayers on existing drilling leases is unfair. Because of a bureaucratic oversight by the Department of Interior during the implementation of the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act of 1995, oil companies that secured leases in 1998 and 1999 were exempted from royalties, regardless of the prevailing market price of oil.

Recent lawsuits have exposed more leases going back to 1996 to this same loophole. This stands in stark contrast to other, similar leases, which require the payment of royalties if the price of oil exceeds a certain threshold. The GAO estimates the loss to the U.S. Treasury of more than $50 billion over the life of these royalty-free leases - a huge subsidy for Big Oil. And investigations have found serious problems in the management of the entire royalty program.

The bottom line is that our energy future doesn't lie off our shores. Instead, we should be investing in wind and solar power, and renewable energy.




For more responses, see http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/the-administration/95125-the-big-question-should-obama-reconsider-drilling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. obama should use this as reason to accelerate switch to clean energy
And for cars and trucks already on the road, algae based biofuels, which could be formulated to require little or no modification to those vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who in the administration can do this?
I'm not sure there's anyone in the administration that is in a position to exploit this situation. "Go slow, small steps" Rahm isn't one to leap at chances to be transformational. Obama's interest in "persistent" action on items doesn't lend itself to seizing unanticipated opportunities like this one. Especially one that would require a major shift in one of his previous positions. It would be confused by the fact that the White House's legislative agenda is currently focused on Banking Reform. I can't think of who is in the cabinet with enough knowledge to put together a solid program for a "great leap forward" in our national energy infrastructure. Quite honestly, the only democrat I suspect with the governmental and technical connections is Al Gore. And Obama hasn't demonstrated much of an interest in working with democrats quite that far left in the party. And I'm dubious he's willing to let Banking Reform become second fiddle to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. he should renounce it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. the fact that they are even asking that question tells me everything I need to know
apparently they are simply stalling for time to come up with some bogus rationale for continuing to drill baby drill. The biggest oil spill in world history, threatening to kill all the oceans--and they're even asking if they should reconsider their policy of drilling? Why is this administration so stuck on stupid? Is it THAT lucrative to kiss CEO ass? SO personally lucrative that the whole planet be damned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. My god, the pro-drill RW woo is strong
in the comments section at this link.

Summarizing and paraphrasing a series of them.

"Obama and/or the enviros blew up this rig on purpose."

These crazy kookfarts are showing up everywhere. Everywhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC