Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:13 PM
Original message
Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling
By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON, HENRY FOUNTAIN and MATTHEW L. WALD
Published: May 13, 2010

WASHINGTON - The political ripples from the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster spread in the capital on Thursday as six West Coast senators proposed a permanent ban on drilling in the Pacific and another group tried to raise oil company liability in such a spill to $10 billion from the current $75 million.

The move by senators from Washington, Oregon and California, all Democrats, was largely symbolic because there are no plans today to open the West Coast to drilling. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, withdrew a modest plan for new offshore drilling shortly after the gulf accident.

The liability measure was pushed by Democratic Senators Frank R. Lautenberg and Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Bill Nelson of Florida, who said the current limit represents a small fraction of the likely damage from the BP spill.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, a strong proponent of offshore drilling, blocked their bill, saying it would discourage all oil exploration. She is sponsoring a separate bill to raise oil taxes by a penny a barrel to increase the federal spill response fund.

remainder here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14spill.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about the Atlantic? What about the freakin' Gulf?
Why selectively propose a ban in just the Pacific?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. As the Op states, the measure would be mostly symbolic, but,
the limited liability of 75 million, after clean up costs, would be raised. The precedent of a ban anywhere in the
US would be a great beginning, imo.

Politically speaking, I have no idea where Obama is going to end up on this issue, so far he hasn't said how much the
cap will be raised. Considering the reduced liability our SCOTUS handed over to Exxon Mobile, I imagine our lawmakers
will be keeping that in mind.


Sucks big time :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do that. Atlantic may be as good as finished already. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC