Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Easily Debunked Denial (Steve Benen, Washington Monthly, in re: Rand Paul)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:33 PM
Original message
An Easily Debunked Denial (Steve Benen, Washington Monthly, in re: Rand Paul)
AN EASILY DEBUNKED DENIAL.... After multiple interviews in which Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul explained his opposition to the Civil Rights Act infringing on private enterprise, his campaign aides have decided to try a new tack. As of this afternoon, the new strategy is to simply pretend that the positions the candidate has already articulated are not actually the positions the candidate believes.

In other words, afraid of how explosive this may be, the Rand Paul Senate campaign is giving lying a shot.

This afternoon, a spokesman for the Paul campaign told Greg Sargent, "Civil Rights legislation that has been affirmed by our courts gives the Federal government the right to insure that private businesses don't discriminate based on race. Dr. Paul supports those powers."

<snip>
Worse, this is always been Paul's decision. This afternoon, Dave Weigel notes remarks the right-wing ophthalmologist made several years ago.

In a May 30, 2002, letter to the Bowling Green Daily News, Paul's hometown newspaper, he criticized the paper for endorsing the Fair Housing Act, and explained that "a free society will abide unofficial, private discrimination, even when that means allowing hate-filled groups to exclude people based on the color of their skin." (Hat tip: Page One Kentucky.)


<snip>

Indeed, this new report drives the point home nicely -- Paul not only thinks the Civil Rights Act was excessive, but he doesn't even support the Fair Housing Act, for the same reason.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think I just heard the toast popping up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. A more logical strategy would be, to say as a Libertarian Paul believes
many things, but as a Republican candidate he must conform
to the Republican Party Principles.

What amazes me is why the Media and the GOP did not explore
his "beliefs" early in the Primary. The Republicans should
have a thorough understanding of Libertarianism. Liberty
and the INDIVIDUAL are primary. One person cannot infringe
or hurt another person, otherwise you are free to do just
about anything you wish. The government cannot take rights
from one in order to provide rights to another. The Government
cannot take tax money from one group to give to another.
There is a tendency to look at the Constitution and in a
literal sense, the government has no right to establish
anything that is not literally listed in the Constitution.
(All Libertarians are not this constitutional. Live and Let
Live.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You almost make it sound rational and sane.
But only almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC