Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Coal Plant spews 650 mil gal of heated water into Lake Erie each day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:47 PM
Original message
Ohio Coal Plant spews 650 mil gal of heated water into Lake Erie each day
Ohio Coal Plant Linked to $30m in Annual Economic Damage
http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/06/03/ohio-coal-plant-linked-to-30m-in-annual-economic-damage/


<snip>

The Bay Shore facility lacks cooling towers, which means that every day it has to draw over 650 million gallons of fresh water. In the summertime, that requires the plant to suck in the entire Maumee River! The water is then spit back into Lake Erie, 5-12 degrees Fahrenheit warmer, and with 126,000 fewer fish every day. This destroys fish populations in Lake Erie that would otherwise be used by Ohioans for recreation or commercial sale.

<snip>

“We now know that the estimated $100 million cost of installing cooling towers is economically justified by the annual $29.7 million economic loss from the fish kills,” said Sandy Bihn, a member of the Oregon City Council and Executive Director of the Western Lake Erie Waterkeeper Association.

“Ohio’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) needs to require Bay Shore to install cooling towers to reduce the millions of fish – and billions of larval fish – killed each year.”

This report also comes as the Ohio EPA reviews its draft of a wastewater discharge renewal permit for the Bay Shore facility – which we are urging them to reject.

<snip>

It’s not just a problem of fish – though that would be bad enough. The Bay Shore plant, along with three other FirstEnergy-owned plants along the shore of Lake Erie, is also under a Notice of Violation from the United States Environmental Protection Agency for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. Bay Shore has no modern pollution controls and contributes to Ohio’s chronic conditions of poor air quality, through heavy emissions of dangerous soot, smog and mercury.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. water use by category:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. OMG

We all know that coal and nuclear power plants use a lot of water, but to see it graphed out like that is an eye opener.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, gosh. They just figured it out.
FISH ARE A FOOD SOURCE FOR US.

So, any chance of building those cooling towers in this century?

Our children are going to hate us for what we did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have thermal polluters here in NJ as well.
http://www.njbiz.com/article-multiple/80877-exelon-warns-of-possible-oyster-creek-plant-shutdown

The plant currently discharges wastewater to a canal that leads to tributaries of Barnegat Bay. Benson said Gov. Chris Christie and acting DEP Commissioner Bob Martin asked stakeholders at Barnegat Bay to discuss the power station’s environmental impact, which Exelon said it supports.

DEP spokesperson Elaine Makatura said the permit process would take at least one year before a final decision is made. She said a public comment period closed Monday, and the state agency is reviewing the gathered statements. “The next step is to evaluate the hundreds of comments we got, put something in writing and make a recommendation,” she said.

Organizations and private firms in favor of the cooling towers said the price tag Exelon bemoans is far higher than their estimates. Bill Powers, principal of Powers Engineering Inc., in San Diego, issued a letter Monday to the Bureau of Surface Water Permitting citing a much lower cost estimate for construction of the cooling towers. Powers said in the letter the cooling towers could be installed at capital cost of less than $200 million. Powers commented on behalf of the Eastern Environmental Law Center.

Powers said in the letter that installation of cooling towers would reduce intake and discharge of water at the Oyster Creek station by more than 98 percent. He also stated construction of the towers could create from 100 to 250 construction jobs during the two-year construction phase, and add some 65 permanent jobs related to the cooling towers.

http://www.cleanoceanaction.org/index.php?id=323

The current cooling system, a “once-through cooling system,” removes, on average, 1.3 billion gallons of life-rich estuarine waters from Barnegat Bay EACH DAY, close to 600 million gallons of which is then discharged as chlorinated, heated, lifeless water. The remaining 732 million gallons a day of estuarine water is mixed with this chlorinated, heated water.
NJDEP’s “Preferred Alternative” - Alternative # 1 - requiring a closed-cycle cooling system is the best alternative as it is the “best available technology.” (NJDEP issued a draft New Jersey Pollution Discharge Elimination System or NJPDES permit renewal.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey! Half of that lake is OURS
Are there any provisions in NAFTA that allow us to SUE for loss of wildlife? Because I think we should if this shit is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC