By now you've heard about the story burning up the right: A U.S. Agriculture Department official says the USDA forced her to resign because Andrew Breitbart posted a video of her supposedly describing how she didn't help a white farmer 24 years ago because of racial reasons.
The woman has now said the video is bogus and that she said nothing of the kind, and she's hinted that the White House urged her firing.
So the question is this: Did the White House have this woman fired before the facts were known, all in response to what may prove to be a Breitbart-manufactured racial controversy? If so, this would illustrate an appalling White House willingness to "jump" when Breitbart says "how high," as Digby put it in a scorching post today.
I generally agree with Digby's read, but I want to urge a bit of caution here. The woman's public statements thus far don't quite say conclusively that the White House directly ordered her firing. There are still more facts to come out. That said, it seems unlikely that the USDA would undertake such a high-profile axing of the woman without consulting the White House first.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/07/did_white_house_get_woman_fire.html