Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DUers must read -- Letter from China: The U.S. embarrassment at the World Expo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:42 PM
Original message
DUers must read -- Letter from China: The U.S. embarrassment at the World Expo
Letter from China: The U.S. embarrassment at the World Expo
http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2010/08/19/letter-from-china-the-u-s-embarrassment-at-the-world-expo/?section=magazines_fortune

How would you portray your own country to the world if you could choose literally anything? If you're Germany, you'd build an amazing biodegradable structure with shots of the country's most beautiful sights, host a fun show featuring an enormous digital screen on a moving crystal ball, and finish off with steins of Weissbier for everyone. If you're Mexico, you'd display Frida Kahlo paintings, and the stone towers of Chichen Itza. And if you're the good old USA, you'd put your top politicians on the screen (yep, we were the only ones to do this), show a silly movie about people working together to make a garden, and finish up with poster boards of all the giant companies that actually run things—contributing to the conspiracy theories of many that those are, in fact, our true leaders.

I may be late to the Shanghai World Expo party—the massive PR event for every country in the world that has been running since May—but I must admit that the US pavilion bummed me out. Aren't we more than just a collection of giant corporate entities and politicians? Don't we have more to offer than knowing how to say "Ni Hao" to our Chinese hosts (many of whom are totally fluent in English)?

I wasn't the only one, it appeared; though I couldn't understand what they were saying, the body language of the thousands of Chinese schoolkids and tourists who had been waiting as long as three hours to get into the pavilion did not seem positive. After all, there wasn't really anything to DO but sit through three movies (and no popcorn! this is America, right?) spouting clichés about friendship and teamwork that might have come out of Brezhnev-era Soviet Union propaganda. Though the gift shop was, as is our wont, well-stocked.

It turns out that there is a story behind our strange self-portrayal, and it's about money, of course. Unlike many of the other exhibitors, who saw this as an attempt to introduce their country and its products to a new middle class of Chinese (the government estimates some 70 million visitors will see the Expo, most of whom are from the country), the U.S. government was prohibited from spending one dollar on the Expo; private fundraising went so poorly, thanks to the 2008 elections and the financial crisis, that nearly at the last moment, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had to go, tin cup in hand, to corporate sponsors to ask for the $60 million needed. Not to do so would have been a huge diplomatic embarrassment, as China, with a total Expo price tag of $45 billion, saw this as the latest dance step in the country's decade-long coming out party and would have not been pleased to have the US as a no-show.

It is understandable that the corporations asked to contribute, such as Chevron (CVX), P&G (PG) and Boeing (BA), wanted something in return—but there, the decisions come off as short-sighted: a bunch of poorly-disguised ads don't do much to help improve our suffering reputation around the world. Maybe we could have showed off our American ingenuity by doing something truly creative with little money. At least we might have tried to advance the theme, "Better City, Better Life." Even a live Yankees game, with hot dogs for all, might have worked.

I guess I should give my legislators a little bit of credit: Although the Expo is a sight to behold—the 200-odd pavilions take more than a week to get through, and the amount of building it required probably took care of China's architects and contractors for the next several years—perhaps it makes more sense to spend our money on real diplomatic efforts or job creation than creating a Disney-fied version of a country that will, in the end, be torn down and thrown away. Still, at a time when tensions run high, it would have been great to have had something that showed what we are really all about.

That's what happened over in the Cuba pavilion, which I dashed over in the middle of a thunderstorm to see. Yes, I had to go to China to get to Cuba, the weirdness of which was not lost on me (our Chinese guide almost fell over when I explained that as an American, I couldn't go to Cuba. I said that it was kind of a long story). Inside, in a relatively tiny space with walls painted to look like Cuban apartment buildings, was a cigar exhibit, some music, and, yes, a giant bar. As I happily sipped my mojito, I thought about how great it would be to hang out in Cuba. And that was the point.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our corporate overlords are pleased
that we have noithing else to offer but cliche and gift shop junk...

If we really had ingenuity or were investing in our green infrastructure, we'd have something to show after all. Instead, we may as well have had a military truck there with wall st bankers throwing cash at passers by...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. China would like their money back
SNL Opening, my absolute fave about this issue:

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/china-cold-open/1178451/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. We used to make a bigger deal about this sort of thing...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. The US has been stripmined by a small cabal of rich men
and the corporations they control to the point that we're now a country in steep decline. Only a sharp 180 degree turn from Reaganism and abandonment of empire will get our country back and so far, we seem to lack the will for either, especially in Congress.

In the short term, I am pessimistic and I see this sad expo of politicians and cheap junk as perfectly representative of what this country has become after 40 years of unbroken conservative rule by both political parties.

At least now people are dimly realizing they've been had and so has the country as a whole. That might be the seed of the type of revolution we need, just please let it be a peaceful one.

In the meantime, I find what this country did at an Expo to be entirely predictable. I'm not embarrassed, I'm just terribly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. They Shoulda Sent a Bunch of Burners



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should have featured all of the stuff you can buy at Wal-Mart

The Chinese might have found it interesting to see where all their shit goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually it sounds like the US display was the only one which was honest..
Mexico should feature drug wars fueled by government corruption at all levels. China could have people working and being paid in less kicks to the head than if they didn't work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds fitting for 21st Century America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. At Last, TRUTH IN ADVERTISING!
So ends the City on the Hill, covered in billboards and buried in a landfill of broken dreams and ideals.

And her people, what of them? Do they cower in the ruins, or take refuge in the wilderness, from whence they shall rise to take back their futures?

Stay tuned to this station for further bulletins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. sadly, it did
"Still, at a time when tensions run high, it would have been great to have had something that showed what we are really all about."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullpit Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. The business of America
Is business. Was then, is now and always will be. It seems some people actually believe that this country was founded because certain people had some funny and rather imaginative ideas about pursuing religious freedom, liberty and all that sort of hokey stuff. Some grand experiment in democracy. Nonsense. Rich man bankrolling explorers to find new ways to make more money is what spawned the whole exploration of the new world. An oversimplified way of putting it? You bet. But distilled to it's simplest form, that's what started the whole deal. Now we've evolved to such things as "The Jersey Shore". Haven't we come a long ways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dumb World's Fair pavilions appear to be a U.S. specialty
It was at the 1967 Montreal World's Fair that the walls were covered with what looked like leftovers from a pop culture memorabilia shop. The part that had people scratching their heads was the wall covered with different kinds of hats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. The Chicago World Fair in 1893 was the showcase of Tesla's electricity.
It must have been spectacular. Tesla literally turned on the lights, and the whole place lit up. That was, I believe, the first time that the world had experienced so much bright, electric light in one place.

The story of that Fair is told in a video on Tesla (Netflix has it.)

http://www.neuronet.pitt.edu/%7Ebogdan/tesla/chicago.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob Jacobson Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. This FORTUNE article contains a significant omission.
The author, Jennifer Reingold, an editor with FORTUNE, wrote a very savvy article. But she missed something important: US law does NOT forbid the Congress from appropriating funds to create a US Pavilion at a World Expo. This was the first time ever that it was not asked for such an appropriation by sitting Administrations, Bush and Obama. That's because it is the policy of the State Department privatize its public diplomacy functions, including our representation at Expos. So, hiding behind the Big Lie that a law prevents funding, both Administrations sought to sell the US Pavilion -- typically an expression of diverse American cultures -- to multinational corporations.

Unfortunately, the individuals to which the Bushies sole-sourced the fundraising effort, without public notice or review, proved incompetent. Twice the Chinese were called in to finance the operation, once to provide seed capital and again when the operation, in 2008, appeared on the verge of bankruptcy. Many observers expected things to change when Obama took office, but were they surprised. Rather than returning to the traditional method of seeking an appropriation to fund a pavilion representative of all Americans, Hillary stepped in and executed on the Bush plan, better than Rice or her ilk ever could.

The result was the same, a crappy, corporate pavilion -- and one that's totally tax-exempt due to a rushed IRS designation of Shanghai Expo 2010, Inc., the operating corporation, as worthy of tax-exempt status. (This despite the fact that SE 2010's Washington, DC, corporate registration was in bad standing.) That means that this six-month, $75 million-plus infomercial is totally tax exempt. We the people, who pay our taxes, are going to have to make up the tax revenues that otherwise would have resulted. Welcome to Wonderland.

For more on the whole sordid study, here are resources:

My articles in the Huffington Post including the main one, "'Blackwatering' Public Diplomacy," May 3, 2010. You can find a list at

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-jacobson

Shanghai correspondent Adam Minter's article in Foreign Policy, "A Sorry Spectacle," March 8, 2010

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/03/08/a_sorry_spectacle

and a series of revelatory postings on his well-regarded blog, Shanghai Scrap (as in iron):

http://shanghaiscrap.com/?cat=38

Like many of the readers here, Jennifer Reingold was surprised to learn this more complicated story. Hopefully, the Congress and IRS will look into the matters. One can hope....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. excellent post, Bob
welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. That is a great post.
Welcome to D.U. Bob:hi:

Thanks to Billy Burnett for the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Thanks for that info, Bob. It's very disturbing on many levels reading it...
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks to Billy Burnett for this worthwhile material.
Also so helpful seeing the first post from Bob Jacobson, with links.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC